25% US Large Cap
25% US Mid
25% US Small Cap
25% International
No bonds. Will reconsider at age 40.
Tax strategy - Traditional is more focused in Large and Mid. Small and Intl (higher expected returns) go in Roth.
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)
Personal Finance
3803 readers
1 users here now
Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!
Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
You should go look at the top 10 holdings of your equity funds you’re in. I bet for two of them it’s identical.
This is correct. S&P 500 and whole market funds are nearly identical. I'd choose the lower cost fund, and throw in a small allocation to small cap value, but that's just me.
Gonna set a fire in here:
62% UPRO 3x S&P500
11% UMDD 3x S&P400 MidCap
27% East Coast Strategic Credit fund (Credit Spread strip strategy)
Quarterly rebalancing with a 70% equity / 30% alternative "neutral" balance target.
Investment horizon ~50+ years
More or less:
- 70-75% US total market
- 25-30% international total market
My only bonds are in my efund, which makes my portfolio quite aggressive.
So mine looks pretty similar to yours, but I have a little more international and no bonds. I'm guessing our portfolios perform similarly.
Edit: tax strategy
My after tax accounts are in international funds for the foreign tax credit, my Roth accounts are in US stocks (highest expected growth), and my pre-tax accounts fill in the gaps.
I don't make enough to max 401k + Roth but if I ever get there I'll have to remember the foreign vs. domestic note. From reading this thread I think I definitely need to phase out contributing to bonds for a while.
Bonds should reflect your risk tolerance and time horizon to retirement. The closer you are to retirement or the more nervous you'd get if the market has a significant downturn (say, >30% losses in a single year), the more bonds you should have.
100% TDF, set it and forget it
I'm pushing 60, so I've collected accounts at Vanguard, Fidelity, Schwab and a couple credit unions. I've got too many individual funds and ETFs to list, but my allocation is:
45% domestic stocks 25% international stocks 25% US bonds 5% short term/cash
My stocks are nearly all index with a slight small-value tilt.
You are young, however this is a very aggressive portfolio. You're 3% bonds, 6% international stocks, and 90% domestic stocks.
I'm not saying it's bad to be aggressive, as I'm actually 100% in stocks, but be aware of the worst case scenario.
I think your math is assuming FFLDX is 100% domestic stock, but according to the Fidelity research page it's ~55% domestic stock, ~35% foreign stock, ~10% bonds so it actually very closely mirrors my Roth distribution (totally accidentally however... I actually hadn't looked at it before today, I just knew the returns were only about half of the S&P500 over any given period of time).