this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
263 points (97.1% liked)

Work Reform

9823 readers
1372 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A proposal from the Labor Department would make an estimated 3.6 million salaried workers newly eligible for overtime pay. It covers workers earning less than $55,000 per year.

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is great for teachers. Overworked, underpaid, and under appreciated!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re not wrong, but that only applies to teachers in low cost of living areas. High cost of living teachers start at $55k these days.

I also wonder how it would work. My wife clocks in when she gets to school and clocks out when she leaves, but she still lesson plans and grades papers at home.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Not a teacher, but I'm salaried and have to log every hour each day. Ours is for contract and project costing purposes though

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They meant that the salary cutoff is too low for some teachers to benefit.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People should be paid for the work they perform. If someone is hired for a 40hr a week job but it takes 80 hrs a week to do the job the company needs to hire someone else or pay the one employee more. Companies are stealing time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

If it takes 80h/wk then that means half the work just isn't going to get done. My personal time is more valuable than any amount of money.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good start but really should be higher.

I would think at lease 80k

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Nah, 200k. Then as inflation increases and wages inevitably go up, we'll be good for at least a couple decades.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. A third of my engineering team were former teachers with bachelor's/master degrees. They're amazing people who would be teaching the future.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Except in a few states, teaching high school doesn't pay. College can pay but it takes years to get there.

My high school science teacher was amazing. He loved teaching. Had to work a second job to pay for his lifestyle which was very basic. He was the teacher of the year many times and still had to work a second job.

If you are salary, the position should pay more. It is often used to work with someone without paying them fairly.

I think wages are often between the worker and the employer but I do think regulations should stop abuse. While fast food places are not highly profitable, they shouldn't screw people to make a profit.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

It's a good start. Not perfect, but a start.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'd be fine if we could just keep working from home

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What a bunch of half-assed bullshit, thanks I guess?