this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19309 readers
2168 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

If it's this easy to manipulate trump, just imagine how easy it is for Russia.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Lmaoooooooooooo eel on musk played himself 😂

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

All part of the theater...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The hyaenas will be at each others' throats constantly. Trust will be there under defining feature of the next Trump administration.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

This specific tension happened a lot sooner than I expected.

Let's see... a guy famous for (among other things) owning a company that builds electric cars teams up with the guy who said he wants to outlaw electric cars. Fireworks were inevitable at some point.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think EVs are the key issue here. The key issue are the grotesquely overinflated egos they both have. It's basically impossible for them to accept anyone as equal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

It's called narcissism and they are both textbook examples of it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Tesla produces primarily stock market manipulation schemes, cars secondly...

The value isn't tied to the cars they produce now, so it doesn't matter how many cars they actually sell.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

No it's a guy who wants to be king vs a guy who wants to hold the whip but both view themselves as heroes and the greatest gift to humanity.

One thinks his personality is what won him over and will keep all the support of his followers and one thinks he's the smartest person in the room and his correctness will show that he deserves all his followers.

It's cult leader narcissist vs cult leader narcissist. They don't even have to get to policy before the breakdown occurs.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trust will be the one defining feature of the ~~next Trump~~Musk administration.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

That was an autocorrect error. None of those fuckers trust each other one bit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

He can’t do fuck all, Musk was elected president. Trump can smoke a fat dick.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think this is hilarious. I wonder if they have some kind of agreement that trump can't just back out of. Maybe it was a handshake deal and he's just now getting annoying enough?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It isn't really an 'agreement', it is power. Money is power, and that makes Musk extremely powerful. He has shown that he can literally buy congress - either directly, or by threatening to back challengers. And while trump has the title of President, he doesn't have the power: it has been shown that trump backing a person just isn't enough to get them elected any more, unlike Musk's money backing a person.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Fight! Fight! Fight! (grabs popcorn and a few beers).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Lmfao. Good!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Trump ought to get congress to pass the spending bill just to show Musk who's boss.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope president Musk can keep his hired goon under control.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Lol it's so easy to manipulate Trump into turning on people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I think it was an YUGE step for Trump to admit he can’t do the job on his own. And, to let Rupert Murdoch and Vladdy Daddy make him let Elon have control could not have been easy. So kudos Don, for admitting you’re just not smart enough and needed help.

The greatest South African inserted Immigrant President of all time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

It's lucky that Elon is the president and not Trump.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Keep saying it over and over.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Nothing in this article supports the headline directly. The last paragraph is.
"There’s no telling just yet how much of a rift this has caused between the two men, as Musk seems to be a long-term fixture in Trump’s inner circle. But if this kind of public one-upping continues, who knows how long this bromance will last."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Good good let the hate flow through you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

These men will only be broken through their ego. I had a feeling this was coming, but I thought it would take longer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Oh, this is fantastic. A group of individualists will never function cooperatively

I'm optimistic that trump has built a pool of piranhas to jump into on January

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›