Is there a particular reason this can't be done as layers are deposited?
Hardware
A community for news and discussion about the hardware side of technology.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].
Takes a long time and risks creating voids that offgas or pop during reflow. Currently there are options for conductive copper filled epoxies. This appears to use a combination of copper slugs / disks and chemical deposition to save time and avoid voids in the larger central area.
One thing to know is that the spaces below components like CPUs are frequently filled with holes that connect the part to other parts on the PCB. They're called vias. This is because they have too high a pin density to connect all of them on a single layer.
Still, perhaps the sizes of the via pads could be adapted to these findings? Using vias to dissipate heat on other parts is fairly common, but I don't know if current standards are as efficient as this.
Neat idea! I bet it's expensive though.