this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36135 readers
111 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Srsly? They'll never stop, any more than the pope will become a Muslim.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

"right to work" is the same bullshit nomenclature as 'pro-life' programs that lead to womens deaths.

its lies to convince the common man to vote against their best interests.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

lol "Right to Work" - Conservatives love to use "freedom" words when they ban or restrict something. If they instituted the death penalty for criticizing the government it would be the "Freedom From Putting Up With Whining" Bill.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

No, that would be called "right to die with dignity"

Even though that means the opposite of what it means anywhere else (euthanasia)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're onto killing a bigger fish: The National Labor Review Board.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Relations not review

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right to Bow To Employer's Whim laws you mean?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, will they try it again?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Try it? They'll enshrine it in the constitution with the control they have now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They don't have the control to pass such.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What makes you think they care about that?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I'll repeat what I've been repeating.

There are no more easy problems left. Government is a hard problem.

Hard problems do not have easy solutions.

Government is a lumbering giant. No single president has been able to meaningfully change the course of American history in their own tenure.

Is the situation dire? Yes. Is it scary? Also yes.

But government doesn't just clear road blocks. Not even for a dictator. So keep it in mind, and fight like hell to keep your liberties.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (9 children)

A quick Google search:

In the context of labor law in the United States, the term right-to-work laws refers to state laws that prohibit union security agreements between employers and labor unions.

And I still don't know what right-to-work laws are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

"Right to Work" simply means "Anti-Union".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Right to work is: A right to be fired at any point for any reason or no reason at all

The goal is to get around any union protections that require things like a legitimate reason to be fired from a job.

It also has the added bonus of drastically reducing the benefits of unions and making them much easier to prevent.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No union I've ever been part of required me being in it in order to work at a place. It was always optional. So strange.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Are you in a right to work state? That might be why, at least in Oregon when I got a job as a cashier it automatically made me a part of the union.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Being fired for any or no reason is at will employment.

Right to work has nothing to do with that. It's about allowing people to not pay union dues. Those people are still protected by the union contract.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

You’re right. I updated the comment

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I love how we name laws that really mean the exact opposite of what their name implies. Very american.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Very human. Democratic Republic of Korea.....Congo....lol.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

whoever told you that is your enemy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

"Truth Social"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You're conflating "at will employment" with "right to work" laws.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

You’re right. I updated the comment

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

The way I try to remember it is that it comes from the employers perspective:

  • Right to Work employees to death by ignoring unions
  • The employer has the right to fire workers At Will
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I mix these two up as well - thanks for the clarification.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This slowly degrades the power of the union and ultimately reduces wages and benefits of the workers

I'm not sure I buy into that - but that said I live in a country where unions are popular, but unions are not allowed to force people to join (but unions do have a right of access to workplaces to ask people to join / hold meetings).

Firstly, it doesn't take that big a percentage of an employer's workforce to strike before a strike is effective... companies don't have a lot of surplus staff capacity just sitting around doing nothing. And they can't fire striking union workers for striking.

Secondly, if all employees have to belong to one particular union, that also means the employees have no choice of which union, and hence no leverage over the union. Bad unions who just agree to whatever the employer asks and don't look after their members then become entrenched and the employees can't do much. If there are several unions representing employees, they can still unite and work together if they agree on an issue - but there is much more incentive for unions to act in the interests of their members, instead of just their leadership.

A lack of guaranteed employee protections, on the other hand, is inexcusable - it's just wealthy politicians looking out for the interests of their donors in big business.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Is it in Colorado? If it is, it's a good thing. If not, it's a bad thing. Right to work is a bad thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Hopefully, I’m not wrong, but basically unions typically require Members Pay dues out of income. Right to work essentially forbid that practice making do payments optional. Which drives down the union revenue

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Right to Work means you can have a union job but not join the union. You have the right to”right to work” without being a union member or paying any union dues. Generally it means you get all the benefits without contributing but also unions are usually a lot weaker since so many people opt out, so also the benefits are lesser. Because it is governed by state-level laws, details vary from state to state.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

right to work means you can have a job in a union shop without joining the union.

My grandpa was a snow plow driver for the state of MN (retired sometimes in the 1990s), but as a republican was always opposed to the union. He still paid union dues, but they were reduced and kept in a separate fund by the union and only used for contract negotiations (important for him - he was a big republican and the union political funds of course donates to democrats). Since he wasn't a member of the union he couldn't vote on union leadership, but the leadership called him one of their best people there because he always attended the union meetings where contacts were discussed. As you can start to see not being a union member when there is a union is really complex weird. I'm sure there is more about this that I don't know about (one obvious thing - what if they voted to go on strike)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm a union organizer, and by coincidence I live in MN, so this is my bread and butter.

You pretty much nailed it, with the only exception that right-to-work laws allow everyone in the workplace, even members, to avoid paying dues entirely. As the map shows, MN is not one of those states though. We have different terms in organizing circles. We call states with right-to-work "free rider" states, and those without are called "fair share" shares.

Every union decides how they want to handle nonmembers outside of their legal obligations. My union is CWA, we don't allow nonmembers to have any say at all on union matters. This means no input on the bargaining survey, no bargaining update emails, no electing the executive board, no voting on the contract, no participation in committees, no admittance to most meetings, etc.

one obvious thing - what if they voted to go on strike

In both cases, regardless of free rider laws, nonmembers are not entitled to the strike fund. The dues equivalency your grandpa paid excluded the few cents for the strike fund and a few other union governance things like that. However, they can still participate in the strike.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s great insight from someone on the ground with type of stuff. Do you think the GOP is gonna attempt to do it Federally again?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Honestly, it's hard to say. I think it's quite possible, however there's a surprising twist with the upcoming admin: the nominee to chair the NLRB isn't shit and has an outstandingly ok labor record as a Republican.

Edit: fwiw I know exactly how much that actually means. It just means we might get some weak pushback against the destruction of the NLRB, but the labor movement has worked with less.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Unions typically have an agreement where employees don’t have to join the union but they still have to pay a fee equivalent to union dues, and the employer can’t pay non-members more than union members, or other similar restrictions.

The idea is to remove the ability for the employer to offer an advantage to non-members.

TLDR it’s an essential part of making a functional union.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

They prevent you from having to join a union to work at a company. And you don't have to pay dues either.

You can effectively benefit from the unions bargaining without supporting the union - which if enough people do that kills the union (the goal of the law).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Let me make this easy for everyone.

If something is detrimental to average Americans and beneficial to the wealthy, Republicans will absolutely attempt to do it.

That is a fullproof formula.

The part that's hard to wrap your mind around is how average Americans can be so stupid as to elect them despite this being an easily provable fact.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I'll tell you exactly how. They've purposely gutted our education system.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Missouri voted to amend their state constitution to enshrine abortion rights, and also voted in Republicans into national seats and the white house which is most likely going to result in a national abortion ban that overrides the state constitution.

People are morons.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is a fullproof formula.

Bone apple tea to you my good sir

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thank you so much, this is what I was looking for.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Happy to help!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What is a right to work law?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's an orwellian term for a package of anti-worker and anti-union laws. The centerpiece where the name comes from is making it illegal for a union shop to require workers to pay union dues.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›