this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19226 readers
347 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

it probably chaps Trump's ass that this has gotten so much more attention than his assassination attempt

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Attempts are boring. If he really wanted attention he should have committed.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

All the Maga voters I know have been pretty supportive of the killer, despite the irony that they voted for privatized healthcare.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

They haven't been told what to think yet. That's what's happening now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Wait until their demigod speaks on the matter...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They fear "Government death panels". I wonder how they rationalize a "for profit, private death panel" being any better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I tend to forget the impact of 7 decades of rabid anti-socialism propaganda Americans have been bombarded with. They are not going to think "Sweden" but "Stalinist USSR instead".

It doesn't matters who it benefits, it's the naughty word so it's bad. Keep voting for the leopards.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

My favorite is "communist socialism".

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

MAGA? Luigi is a right winger

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I haven't read his manifesto or anything but he seemed pretty much against fossil fuels and insurance companies, what are we basing his political association on?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Oh man, bro was reposting Peter Thiel lmao. You're correct, Phoneymouse, good link.

A part of me envies him for still being able to appreciate Hulk Hogan despite how awful a person he is.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

So no.

No right winger is going out and following AOC or saying the stuff he did in his manifesto.

At worst he was a bit of a tech bro. Honestly he sounds like a shitlib that finally got radicalised into a leftist.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

His twitter reposted a right wing Billionaire, the one that paid to have Hulk Hogan go on stage and ask people to vote for Donald Trump. He's also made a lot of statements about the Unabomber and been anti-immigration in the past.

Maybe instead of assigning him to a group we should all agree he wasn't of calm or consistent mind.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did you watch the video? It’s like a 20 second clip of the guy saying lots of tech people are neurodiverse and thus don’t allow their dreams to be crushed. It’s simplistic bullshit, but resharing it seems pretty centrist as it’s not rwnj content.

And fuck no? I consider this man one of the most sane, and he calmly planned and worked hard to achieve a noble goal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

In particular, he really emphasized remorse about any collateral damage and took significant steps to minimize it. His statement about the unibomber was essentially "Good motive but horrible execution that hurt a lot of innocents"

In his attack there was a nearby bystander who saw literally everything and he neither harmed her nor appeared to threaten her in any direct manner. He moved to pass her so she could flee.

I still think murder=bad but he took real steps to make sure the only damage from his actions was on the CEO and himself.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or maybe he just didn’t give a shit about any of that and was just really pissed off at health insurance companies, felt that all representation had failed us, and the only solution left was violence

But people will read an article that has barely any info and jump to wild conclusions based on pure speculation to categorize him on one of the “teams” rather than assume he is one of the vast amount of politically apathetic individuals that make up america.

so tons of the right wing will move to paint him as a leftist, because it’s simple with the lack of info available and the current rhetoric surrounding the event, because it is advantageous to them. the left wing will move to distance themselves because there is info available that casts doubt on his being a leftist and again it is advantageous for them to distance.

And while both spend time shitflinging away responsibility for this person, who never claimed either side, it will deflect from discussing the very real issue he exposed with his act: the health care system in this country is so fucked up that when it drives someone to murder an executive a huge amount of people cheer them on

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As a leftist I’m not moving to distance my self from him whatsoever. That sounds more like a shitlib thing tbh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

It's complicated. His politics doesn't seem to fit neatly in any box. If you wanted to pick out facts to paint him as too right wing for the right wing, you can do it. If you wanted to pick out other facts to paint him as the new coming of Weather Underground, you could do that, too. He's also at a time in his life where your politics can shift around a lot, so posts from just a few years ago may not reflect where he is now.

I can say one thing with certainty: he hates people who are worth hating.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

He was a right winger 2 years ago, he retreated from social media etc for a long while, so it might not even reflect his current views.

And if it does? Well, then he'd be a right winger and would have done more for class struggle than I ever did, and most likely ever will. Still very much worthy of respect, even as I'd disagree with most of his views.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Even if he is, the right wing noise machine is trying to get out ahead of this. They don't want their base which is very prone to violence getting any ideas about who is really actively harming them (and it isn't POC, it isn't trans, it's not the left, it's not women...).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Trying to poison the right wing against someone who stood up for them and for all of us. And the sick thing is that it will work.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I went to r/conservative on Reddit just for fun and some of them are already flip flopping. Most are getting down voted to hell, but it was noticeable. But at the same time I wouldn't be surprised if it was bots trying to turn everyone against each other, as is tradition.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Most are waiting for marching orders from dear leader.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

They will get them and fall in line for sure, but it does seem to take a bit longer than usually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Of course it will work. They are objectively terrible people that will openly celebrate any pain done to anyone, including themselves, if they just get to add one more ounce of hate to the world.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The elderly at my job all are rallied against the guy. Been trying to explain to them regardless of how they feel it's a lens into the public opinion.

Watching the media machines gears turn with this one are especially transparent.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Snowflakes lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

After the headline-grabbing execution, questionable portions of the internet immediately began thirsting over images of the alleged killer while denouncing the corporate greed showcased by UnitedHealthcare and its peers.

Lol questionable.

Former Fox News host Megyn Kelly similarly slammed Mangione’s declaration on X writing, “His ‘lived experience’ is about to be punctuated by 3 squares a day and a fear of showering.”

Fuck you.

…with far-right political activist and former political correspondent for One America News Network Jack Posobiec writing on X: “There’s a reason the left supports murderers who shoot businessmen in the street. 

“It’s a feature not a bug.”

You make it a feature.

After news on Mangione’s arrest came to light on Monday, Fox host Jesse Watters weighed in on the 26-year-old’s potential future in prison, claiming that he’s “not ready” and that he’s “gonna get annihilated.” 

“I don’t think anyone’s ready [to go to prison],” Watters said on The Five. “This guy’s not ready. He’s way too soft. He’s gonna get annihilated on the inside, and good.” 

“If he’s not gonna get the death penalty, maybe someone will do him justice behind bars,” he added. “That’s all I have to say about that.”

You get a fuck you too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

They are reflecting on the level of damage they've caused to society and it's clearly terrifying to them that using liberals as the scapegoat isn't always gonna cut it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The left supports killing businessman in the streets.

The right supports killing babies in their cots.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

and kids in their classrooms.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the public reaction to his gets one potential school shooter to rethink their plans and instead shoot a single CEO, that's a net gain. Bonus points if they start talking about gun control and Democrats reply with "it's too soon to talk about that, thoughts and prayers. Maybe install litter boxes in board rooms?"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Maybe install litter boxes in board rooms?

"CROOKED LEFT FORCING CEOS TO BEND KNEE TO CATBOIS"

Sorry for making y'all horny at the prospect

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Remember the cardinal rule of the right!

rape good, murder bad!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Of course.

Unless one is murdering an unhoused man of colour causing a disturbance. Of course.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

"Well the only thing he did wrong was not rape the man while he was passed out before squeezing the last bit of life out of him"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Murdering miscarrying women by refusing them medical treatment is definitely a-okay. Supply-side Jesus loves that kind of murder.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

rape good, murder bad!

Well, unless someone they don't like is murdered in prison, because that's just justice...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Jesus, I didn't plan on reading and just these quotes alone get me. Fuck those people so hard.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

“His ‘lived experience’ is about to be punctuated by 3 squares a day and a fear of showering.

It's interesting how many still casually "joke" about prison rape in this country. At least when it comes to male rape.

If he’s not gonna get the death penalty, maybe someone will do him justice behind bars

This kind of pairs with the rape stuff. There are an awful lot of very gross people that wish for rape AND murder to happen in prison. The idea of our system supposedly being about corrections is a complete farce as long as so many people like that are among us....

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I don't give a shit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course they would. They will be the “CEO’s” for the next couple years. Gotta squash it before it grows.

May their incompetency be their undoing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Watter's assertion that:

"He’s gonna get annihilated on the inside, and good.”

Is probably bullshit. To have the balls to walk up and ice the 21st century version of a vampire will be huge in prison. They hate corporate America just as much as we do.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This guy is gonna be protected on the inside if he makes it there

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I don't think it is outside the realm of possibility that corporate interests would find a way to get another prisoner/guard to kill him. I doubt it would even be that difficult for them. They have so much to offer to a group of people who have been deprived of most things. solidarity to a cause only goes so far when your life is just suffering.

They absolutely have a vested interest in demonstrating to the public that people who kill members of their class will face terrible repercussions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This guy seemed a little iffy in his background - I would think quite a few of the right are celebrating this guy. It would make sense the elitists are trying to pacify that bunch, and try to paint this guy as some kind of leftist, though...they probably don't want the base that has been groomed for violence to suddenly get ideas about a mass movement of vigilantes like this guy stalking and killing the billionaire class.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›