It wasn't removed for being shouty or aggressive, it was removed for "misinformation." If the mods don't like the tone, they should say so, and at least give me a chance to edit it. What they're saying instead is, "This is indisputably proven true, there is no conversation to be had about this, and anyone claiming otherwise is a bad actor," because that's what a removal for misinformation means. Of course, they don't have any evidence to back it up, because as I said, they don't believe in sourcing claims or basing beliefs on evidence.

Of course there were red flags, I'm a communist.

Red flags for what exactly? That I'm not a part of their tribe? Because I say that pretty openly and consistently. Last I checked that's not against the rules.

And what exactly about my first sentence would justify my comment's removal? Skepticism of the government?

Your comment was probably removed because first of all you extremely far from any sort of politness.

Then the mods should've listed that as the reason for removal.

but it’s indisputable that a large number of people were disabled in the same place in a similar timeframe by… somthing.

It actually is disputable, seeing as it's, you know, "a disputed medical condition." Yeah, some people had some symptoms, but what constitutes Havana Syndrome was always incredibly broad and vague, to the point that anything anyone experienced could be chalked up to it. It's nothing but a socially constructed catch-all category for an array of pre-existing health conditions, responses to environmental factors, and stress reactions that were lumped under a single label.

That is, by the way, verbatim from a scientific paper about it.

No, we know it's not the result of some literally physics defying sci fi weapon.

Why are you guys so addicted to victim complex?

He wasn’t banned, his comment was removed. And it wasn’t for disputing Havana syndrome, most of the people in those comments were doing that. They just weren’t combative and unhinged about it.