this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024

175 points (92.3% liked)

Open Source

31659 readers

308 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

175

FOSSIL: A complete Git alternative (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

115 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I would like to introduce you lovely OpenSource Lovers to a GIT-Alternative called FOSSIL that I also stumbled upon because of this Blog. It's basically opensource Github-in-a-box which means it's an SCM with:

Bug-tracker
Ticketting-system
Forum
Wiki-system
even a Chat-functionality
Has built-in GUI
Also has a Web-Server
Self-Hostable like Gitea/Forgejo

& the best part it's all in ONE STANDALONE FILE!!! which is extremely lightweight which you can copy to your $PATH & works even in crappy internet. how cool is that!!

However this tool supports a completely different style of development in FOSS called the "Cathedral-Style" whereas GIT suports a "Bazaar-Style" The person behind Fossil is the creator of SQLite, Dr.Richard Hipp & they even made other projects to support Fossil like a PIC-Like language called PikChr Well just in case; here's a list of difference between Git vs Fossil & guess what!! they even have a hosting service called CHISEL

Listen; Just check it out & use it for fun in your spare time even with the flaws it has (& Try out Darcs & Pijul as well)

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 weeks ago (22 children)

What about git needs replacement?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

Seems like a historic artefact to me as well. And one of their mentioned points was "no sync via http" which even for 2006 makes me... hesitant.

And their history section ends in 2007, couldn't find a feature comparison in their quick start guide.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Git is far from user friendly but that's a design consideration from a decentralized architecture. Fossil will have the same considerations. People need to learn how to use Git.

The problem is there's only one person who really knows how to use it: Linus.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm so fuckin tired of hearing x is user unfriendly, it's not intuitive enough.

Like fuckin yeah. Sometimes you have to actually learn something new to use something new when I first started driving it wasn't user friendly. I had to learn how to do it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

git is exactly as unfriendly as a distributed source control system that doesn’t shy away from power user commands needs to be

… sure it’s difficult to comprehend, but yknow what’s worse? getting into a bullshit situation and having broken garbage repos in every other “user friendly” system on the planet

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] silasmariner 11 points 2 weeks ago

I remember Linus saying in an interview that he'd only really been involved in git for the first 6 months or so and that the other devs had managed it without him since then. This makes sense - Linus's creations aren't successful because he's the only person who understands them, they're successful because there are so many other collaborators on them.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (20 replies)

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I support reconsidering Git VCS hegemony. Darcs & Pijul too for DVCS.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Darcs does not require a central server, and works perfectly in offline mode.

Git can be used that way too. Am I missing something?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago

No, you are not. People regularly equate Git and GitHub, though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

no, this is exactly what git does

load more comments (10 replies)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Darcs came out in 2003—Git in 2005. It was novel at the time compared to the alternatives. Darcs started as alternative to CSV & Subversion, not Git. Unlike Git it works on patches, not snapshots which has advantanges in merge conflicts.

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Am I missing something?

No and, in fact, this was (and still is) a selling point of Git over the alternatives (e.g. Subversion) available at the time that required you to "check out" some code and no one else could check out/modify that code while you had it checked out.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

dont forget about jujutsu

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Since jujutsu is Git-compatible it has very much replaced Git for me and is what I'm using for everything now. Its workflow is so good and miles ahead of Git.

I was trying out Pijul for a while before that and while it has a lot of great ideas and has a lot of potential due to the way its foundations work its interface is way too janky right now and missing features and nothing I've reported or the many changes I've submitted have been fixed/pulled since March. I'd really like it to be good but alas...

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Fossil is more like a Jira replacement, and its built by one person with a severe case of NIH. Not necessarily a bad thing but I lived through it with Ubuntu, not really a fan of this philosophy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

I've worked with NIH VCS. Never again lol, I'll stick to git until something else becomes so universally recognized that people en masse start jumping ship.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"NIH"?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I think "Not Invented Here". Meaning he wants to build everything himself from scratch despite there being alternatives he can use instead.

E.g.: Building your own httprequest library rather than using the existing one which is good enough.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

That makes sense, thank you.

load more comments (6 replies)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Not Invented Here, the urge to rebuild the wheel because someone else did it.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Spent 5 minutes on the website and couldn't get a peek at their code... The most fundamental thing, IMO.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

fossil is made by the sqlite devs, for development of sqlite. this is not some amateur operation.

also, it's by the sqlite people, so expect the code to be... odd.

load more comments (8 replies)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

it's not the most intuitive interface but there you go: https://fossil-scm.org/home/tree?name=src

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Wow C, CSS and JS files at the same level. You don't see this every day

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Learned fossil in college and I intensely disliked it

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This thread might be the fastest I've ever seen discussion devolve from "that could be interesting" to just incomprehensible screaming.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This seems really cool!! And I love to see alternatives to git. But @[email protected], you need to cool it on the replies. You're making the Fossil community look hostile by association.

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I really like the idea of using a relation db to track change history. It removes so much weirdness and quirkiness that git has. You just have regular SQL queries you can use to go through history and ask questions about the state of the repo. I also like that it's immutable so you don't have to worry about things like rebasing and other ways you can fuck up history in git. The problems solved by mucking with history largely go away when you can query the db with a rich syntax.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments