I like the idea but it doesn't seem incredibly usable rn
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
105 points (97.3% liked)
Open Source
31732 readers
120 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
It not only supports IPFS, it is "built on top of" it, according to the website.
This makes me wonder if it's usable for regular web browsing or only IPFS sites. The latter would sort of make it a splinternet browser, and way less interesting.
It's definitely the latter. The sites it renders are just markdown files stored on the IPFS network. I don't think it can render HTML let alone a modern web app on the internet
I do love markdown files myself, so a browser-side parser is very interesting. Definitely skips some Jekyll/Hugo exports π
Limiting that feature to IPFS is sort of one sided for my taste, though.
For now it's a WIP project by one of the creators of Mbin
I don't really get the idea of decentralized internet.
The internet is already decentralized. There are millions of websites hosted on thousands of separately-owned machines.
"Decentralized" services like the fediverse use thus exact same structure and bind them together by a search/aggregation API.
The "centralized" part of the internet is DNS, Service providers, and search.
You are perfectly allowed to go your whole life without using search, or by self-hosting searX.
If we go back to the age of webrings, that is essentially decentralized internet. It seems like every decentralized internet idea is just a rehash of this with some Tor ideas sprinkled in.
You are never going to be able to pull a "Silicon Valley" and make every device into a mini server. The ping and uptime would be horrific.
This is the de-mozillaed Firefox right? Iβve heard of it recently too. IPFS sounds really cool but isnβt it a dud because it uses a singular gateway or something?
No, you're thinking of LibreWolf. This is like an IPFS browser that interprets markdown to render simple sites within the IPFS network
Now Markdown needs a decent spec, but that is cool
I always forget, is CommonMark good enough? Like with table and image support?
I like it! It's not much more than good enough, but that's good enough
Yup. If the standard gets too complicated, it starts to get hard to implement and use, and feature restriction might be necessary for certain use-cases. We want to keep it "good enough" because that ensures it's simple and easy to use, rather than something more capable but more complex like HTML.
If you have a moment, could you enlighten me as to what this singular gateway LibreWolf uses refers to per the top level users comment? Thanks.
They weren't talking about LibreWolf when making the comment about the singular gateway, they were talking about IPFS. But it's right there, you can read it again. Or even ask the original commenter, either by directly replying to them or by tagging them, e.g. @[email protected] can you answer @[email protected]'s question?
What is IPFS?
InterPlanetary File-System basically an upgraded version of torrenting
IGFS when?
When we become a Space-Faring civilization :)
I wonder what they did to get their YouTube suspended.
What in the hell is IPFS and why am I just hearing about this? Is this like a new web?
been around for a bit. peer-2-peer webpages
That sounds awesome, I wanna try it now.