Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce π andπ?
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
177 points (94.0% liked)
196
16573 readers
1898 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Nyar!
ππππ
By using π to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is
I mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can't solve that.
This is bullshit, it defined but didn't even use the continuous functions πand π.
golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
IMSA kid?
Those are backups in case the other functions break down.
π isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange
But what if it was grown in Europe?
Naranja
So to clarify, definitely European and not African?
I don't know falls to his death
Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet theyβll feel real embarrassed about that one when theyβre falling asleep years from now.
Christ, it's like people just don't even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?
I get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why
Its probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren't people
I can answer the question. No.
Heβs right.
"sup" without a "" belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]
scrΓΆdinger's TeX
I am waiting for someone to actually answer this
Thanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving π
Oh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.
Thanks. I've mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.
I can answer the question. No.
The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.