this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
65 points (70.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

29325 readers
1 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The best ones are thoughts that many people can relate to and they find something funny or interesting in regular stuff.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Train can't stop like a vehicle does.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I live in California; many drivers here make it seem like regular cars can't stop either the way they roll through stops.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk if this is more of a local thing but in Ohio we call rolling stops a California stop

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've always heard it called the "California Roll" from other Californians. I like the pun. A California roll is also a local kind of sushi.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

California rolls (sushi) are common in mostly the entire US.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Sweden also has them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They are local like Hawaiian pizza is local to Toronto. They might have been created there but itnhas caught on elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cars in New Mexico appear to have brake failures at every stop sign, they slow down but do not stop.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

When it done where I am at we call it a California stop. Explains where that name comes from that they actually have a saying for that type of "stopping ".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

KY/OH here. It's not a Cali thing, it's an American thing. Almost daily I have people rolling through stop signs or just straight up not stopping at stop lights if they're turning right.

Story time: drove in Europe for the first time this year. Totally different. Lower speed limits even with that weird metric system. Way less lights and more round abouts and stop signs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

not stopped at stop lights if they're turning right

That's because it's actually allowed in the majority of the US

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Well right turns on red are allowed in most of NA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Just to be pedantic, trains are vehicles.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, when your doing 40 and you are 50 feet from the crosswalk, you can't stop either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair, hitting meat bags on the road or a tree could make you stop in less than 40 feet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I heard it takes like 1 mile 1km for a train to come to a complete stop.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Trains have right of way. Cars do not have right of way at cross walks.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

pedestrians should honk

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

When I was in Nepal, busses would round blind corners on barely-two-lane cliffside roads - meaning 100+ metre cliffs above AND below - at full speed, and their only warning was just a bunch of honks. The problem is there's so much honking it's hard to imagine anyone can tell where it's coming from, especially given the people you're trying to warn are around the corner and can probably only hear you due to echoes coming from the far side of the valley.

The game for me became, count how many busses were destroyed at the bottom of the cliffs, or hanging precariously over the edge having punched through the concrete barrier, or tipped on their side in the lowlands, or just... fucking INTEGRATED with one another after a head on collision that definitely killed both drivers and anyone sitting in the driver's quadrant of each bus.

I definitely lost count, except for that last example of which I saw exactly one (1), and I learned that honking is no substitute for real infrastructure. Structural adjustment policies killed those people.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That’s the thing, I live near train tracks/station. The fucking train honks incessantly. There are like 4 or 5 intersections that train crosses in pretty quick succession, plus the station, so they just lay on the horn for a good mile. No one pays attention to it. It’s like the boy that cried wolf. It totally defeats the purpose of it’s trying to alert anyone to anything. Not to mention the noise pollution it needlessly creates. Idk who decided that was a reasonable solution, instead of putting up the people gates, but fuck them. That law needs to be completely abolished imo.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In addition to the whole 'a car is diffent from a train' aspect; trains don't always 'honk' in the US

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Neither do they here (Austria) even though my driving instructor was adamant that they do. "You can trust that if there's no honk, there is no train."

Thanks, driving instructor, but I'd rather go with "if there is no train, then there is no train".

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Trains only honk because they can't stop, so all they can do is warn. Cars should not be going so fast they can't stop on city streets. Also, trains always have the right-of-way, but cars never do, even on roads without crosswalks or sidewalks. They must always yield to all pedestrians in any situation.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it doesnt make sense for the following reason:

Trains have priority. Road users are required by law to yield to them.

Unless the crosswalk is signalized, cars do NOT have priority & are required by law to crosswalk users.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Fine then pedestrians should be honking at every crossing

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Where I live, pedestrians have the right of way at crosswalks (fun fact: when this was introduced somewhere in the 70s, car drivers have been angry about it)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Serious question: are there places in the world that have marked pedestrian crossings (crosswalks), but vehicles DON’T have to give way to pedestrians?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In Prague, pedestrians officially have the right of way, but most drivers don't seem to know that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, unfortunately that seems pretty normal in a lot of places.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yes, Germany.

They have two types of pedestrian crosswalks. One of them is the standard "zebra crossing", where the whole crosswalk is maked with white stripes and there pedestrians have right of way.

The other one just has just dashes at the sides of the crossing, and here pedestrians have no right of way. But if these are present (same with the other type) pedestrians are not allowed to cross the road for iirc 50 meters left or right of the crossing. So it essentially turns the road left and right of the crossing into a "no crossing allowed" zone.

They do this at traffic lights, so that if the light doesn't work pedestrians don't have right of way. And sometimes they just do it to annoy pedestrians, because it's car-country Germany and fuck pedestrians or something.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

People keep posting things saying that, it's not even true.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What do you mean? It's true in Denmark. It's the law that cars have to stop at marked acrosswalks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

As far as I am aware, this is true in Ohio***. At crosswalks, pedestrians have the right of way the moment they step onto the crosswalk - though of course you are supposed to also make sure that by stepping onto a crosswalk you are not causing a hazard (so in other words, don't step on when there is a car coming up fast enough to cause an accident if they suddenly stop for you).

The exception is if you are at a crosswalk with a signal that indicates to NOT cross, then cars have the right of way (or at the very least, you won't catch me attempting to "test" otherwise). Though again, as a driver this doesn't give you permission to just plow through someone whose already crossing if you had the ability to stop safely.

*Right-of-way laws vary everywhere and are not universal (and are very specific - the places I've seen/been at generally indicate that you have to be actively on the crosswalk to have right-of-way, cars don't have to yield/stop to wait for you to step onto and begin crossing), what @[email protected] can be true for where they live, yet it could be false where you live.

**They are also complex sometimes, for example here in Ohio I believe at marked crosswalks you technically only have right-of-way on your half of the crosswalk - if someone coming the opposite direction makes a right turn onto your crosswalk and you're not on "that half" yet, then you are supposed to yield for them.

What it comes down to is, what is true and false regarding right-of-way laws is incredibly specific on context and where you are, which will explain why you're seeing some people say this, and others who aren't.

However, what is generally false is the assumption that pedestrians always have the right-of-way everywhere and anywhere.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

What is glorious is riding high speed trains in other countries. They are built like our interstates, with all crossings either over or under. They don’t use their horn. It is just quit and smooth, and you can get up and walk around, get a tea, or use the restroom. It is far more comfortable than traveling by car.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Downvotes are from the light sleepers annoyed by car honks

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yes, but no, please no.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Please no. Can you imagine the cacophony that'd be?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have heard that when cars were a rare thing in the Old West that drivers had to stop at intersections, get out, and fire a gun to warn any horse-powered cross traffic. It sounds like total bs but there have been stranger laws...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Only in the past handful of years was it no longer made illegal to sneeze in public here in Texas.

It was an old holdover law from when sneezing might spook someone's horse. Not enforced for obvious reasons, though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Not related but man it is so nice to visit places where honking is rare. I am in PV Mexico alot and honking is rare even though driving is quite random and rules are only optional. Driving is actually fairly stress free as it is rare to see anyone angry.

Then you drive in Panama city, Panama. Still no one is angry but honking is continues. Don't turn on a blinker to lane change. Just honk and do it. Regardless of there is a space for you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

If you want even more nutjobs shooting each other in public, sure, go for it. 👍

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

When I took my divers ed class the instructor told us that honking should be used when passing in a two way street. Never seen anyone do it, tho a one finger salute is often given. Not really sure what I should do with the honk now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You hush now sir! Things are quite loud enough as they are.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's seems crazy to me that they are so many crossings over train lines in the US. I think they exist in the UK but they're rare. I remember driving over one when I visited family in Vermont and it was scary 😆

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›