this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
917 points (98.4% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

3402 readers
1321 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out [email protected] (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 236 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 17 hours ago

Literally the Republican Way™©®

It disgusts me to no end. "It's wrong and should be punished until it happens to me!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 12 hours ago (8 children)

This may get downdooted to oblivion, but I think some of this is human nature. It is abhorrent, and something we need to strive to fix, but it is rather natural for people to think that their own situation is typical -- because for them, it is. Every exemplar that a privileged person will have is also a privileged exemplar -- until, of course, something like this happens.

And as a further consequence, it is extremely difficult to convince someone that their personal situation is not the norm. Everyone wants to be the main character and ultimately believes that they are.

Not sure what the solution is.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Provide testing for logic, critical thinking, and empathy in order to vote?

Stop making excuses for stupid people that hold back the progress of mankind?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I'm not trying to make excuses. Though I can appreciate that it looks like that.

But how do we restrict the stupid people? If we agree that every human gets to take part, then it follows that the stupid will be voting.

I don't think a litmus test is the answer, since they are extremely easy to misuse. Why not say only landowners should vote? How about only veterans? It's a dangerous path.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's a dangerous path, but does that mean we shouldn't consider it? Like when you vote you have to correctly identify your candidate's policies. Or you have to answer some moral question like "rich people are rich because they are in some way inherently better". Or if you vote anti choice you're informed "selecting this candidate waives all natal care that may end your fetus' life including termination of an unviable fetus to save your life, sign your name if you waive your medical rights" if they refuse to sign - your vote don't count. But a lot of folks are too dumb to get a say in this shit right now. I think the dumbing down of America is 100% orchestrated and intentional, but we need to fix our dumbness for a few generations and get a good level set of "not being a fucking dipshit" before we can trust the random person on the street has more common sense than a bag of mismatched socks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 14 hours ago

"First they came for..." you fucking ghouls.

You signed a death warrant for us all and for our children's supposed future, and your ignorance and cowardice was the ink.

[–] [email protected] 132 points 17 hours ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 17 hours ago

Good lemming. Keep doing good things.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The poor dear has learned the consequences of voting against her interests far too late. I laughed, but at the same time I'm worried about those who voted in their interests and got fucked over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 13 hours ago

Aww man Im all out of fucks

[–] [email protected] 26 points 14 hours ago

I am rapidly running out of sympathy for such people. I still have some, but I am rapidly running out.

[–] [email protected] 125 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The only moral abortion is MY abortion!

[–] [email protected] 86 points 17 hours ago

Reminds me of brexit. You were warned, lady. You just chose not to listen because you didn’t think it would have a negative impact on you.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 17 hours ago

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

-Francis M. Wilhoit

[–] [email protected] 16 points 13 hours ago

God’s plan, bruh.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 17 hours ago

And nothing was actually learned.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 17 hours ago

"then connected Farmer with an anti-abortion crisis pregnancy center in the state"

I can imagine how that conversation went: "I know its risking not only your reproductive organs, but also your life. However, have you considered carrying the child to term so she can die in your arms shortly afterward so you can 'pwn the libs'? Think about their tears!"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 13 hours ago

Hmmm. This sounds a lot like Karma.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Good. I hope she suffers. She is apparently one of the knuckle draggers who can only learn the hard way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

she won't. if she survives she'll just go back to her old self calling other abortion seekers evil or sluts.

even when they had the right, that's what they did as they are leaving the abortion clinic after having had one themselves ... there's a massive disconnect in the brain.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

It's a sad reality that most pro-life stance people don't understand that most pro-choice people are also pro-life. It certainly doesn't help that some extremists rant loudly about 9th month abortions. But a lot of people who don't like the idea of abortion still understand the need for it, both medical and otherwise, and believe the decision should rest with the parent and doctor, not the government. If there was more open an honest communication then there probably wouldn't be as many single-issue voters voting Republican because of this issue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

She probably still believes all the bullshit too. "too many women are just getting post birth abortions for the funsies" Just the fakest stupidest lies.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

Now I do know and understand the risks along with what is involved with a hysterectomy, but her age along with her political stance brings some questions.

With her being 'mostly pro-life'... Was she against contraception? Did she get pregnant on purpose? Did she know the level of risk to the mother and fetus with a pregnancy after 40? She said she was worried about losing her uterus... Was she wanting to get pregnant again? Did she know she's just around the corner from menopause? Being around her age, the option for freezing one's eggs can be a viable option, especially with the possibility of needing a hysterectomy. Would she be against a surrogate pregnancy?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›