this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
595 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19133 readers
3802 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Yep. That's how the court system works in this country.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The guillotine was designed to minimize suffering.

I would like to posit a 275 kilo power hammer that goes off as many times as you have been "slammed" in headlines.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hung, drawn and quartered is quite effective at maximizing the suffering.

Having your cock cut off and stuffing in your mouth while you're still alive is a pretty brutal final fuck you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

If we really want to maximize suffering, I might suggest a mandolin for the testicles.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 4 days ago (2 children)

As outsider, following events happening in US, its never been more obvious that if you're rich/powerful you cant be touched.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 days ago

Trump has made this so hard to refute, that many of his followers are literally embracing fascism. It's very bad news.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

It really seems like not only can't they be touched, but everyone else is also so jaded by the situation that no one is even fucking trying.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There goes the trust in US institutions for even more people.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's the point. If you make everything clearly shit enough, there will not be resistance to people saying "this is all shit let's rip it up and just make a mess", because that's how you make the most grotesque profits, because profit is made through exploitation.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is spot fucking on.

Whoever the downvote was is an ignorant patsy of the billionaire cult.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Thanks! I'm on an instance where I can't see downvotes. I'm also on an account where I block bad faith posters, so I don't see those for long, either. I recommend it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

How can I trust my government?

As a trans man, my state strips more rights from me everyday. I can be discriminated against in housing or employment. With a recent executive order, I could be arrested for having the “wrong” letter on my drivers license. The federal government is doing NOTHING to keep LGBT folks in southern states safe.

Fuck, in Oklahoma, a transgender child was murdered and the state government was allowed to cover it up! They can kill us and there will be no consequences.

[–] [email protected] 108 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Like, seriously, are these people new here?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's he even being fined, though?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

He is paying for lawyers to prevent him from ever seeing any consequences. That is a "fine"

[–] [email protected] 82 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Merrick Garland needs to be removed and replaced by someone who cares about the rule of law.

He ain’t it. He’s asleep at the wheel.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

He’s so terrified of anything appearing to be “political“, he will absolutely do nothing as long as the criminal is in some way politically connected.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He would have made a decent Supreme Court justice but he's just not cut out to be attorney-general.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

His cowardly inability to pursue justice fairly forces me to disagree with you here. He may have been better than the alternatives, but that hardly makes him any good at all.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (9 children)

You do not need to "pursue justice" as a judge. You just need to allow others to pursue justice through you and possess an ability to apply the law. There are no political repercussions for judges that can harm their career. He acts the way he does because he doesn't want political backlash about it. If he's a judge, he has the ability to not care about others' opinions of his rulings.

The position of attorney-general requires a different skillset and mindset. An effective attorney-general is willing to take risks to pursue justice. Judges play a more passive role. That's why he's not a good attorney-general, but I still maintain he'd be a very good judge.

Lemmy has the tendency to think that because a person is bad in one aspect, they must be bad in every related aspect as well. Of course, nobody will admit they think like that, but I pray you don't.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

Genuinely the most catastrophically idiotic appointment of the entire Biden administration.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Like, seriously, are these people new here?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

wage theft is always worth it for the boss

stealing from work never is worth it for the worker though

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Bold headline considering free speech is about to die with democracy

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Let’s just pick a day. Everyone punches the richest person they can get their hands on.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago

Can it be every day?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

Land of the robber barons! What the founders would have intended.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Even though the federal Department for Justice has a standing policy against prosecuting election-related offences within two months of an election, there's still the possibility that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania can prosecute him for offences committed under Pennsylvania's state election law.

The governor of Pennsylvania has expressed some openness to this happening.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So when you commit a crime, do they like, arrest your ass prompty and shove you in the legal system for potentially years or do they express some openness to it happening.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well, you see, that depends on whether you have a team of highly-paid defence lawyers that can get you off if the prosecution makes even the slightest mistake in their case.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Another confirmation that this is a plutocracy ... or an oligarchy

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

"Potato potatoe". Debating over whether it's an oligarchy, plutocracy, corporatocracy, kakistocracy, etc is splitting hairs. All that matters is the masses understand that voting does not equal democracy when who you can vote for — your choices — are predetermined entirely by wealth and campaign financing; that what we have is not "democracy".

I consider what we have to be a neo-feudalist fusion of all of them, so it's best to think of it like the Kings and Queens of old. There are always significant power plays amongst them, and the US election is merely one of many. The only major difference is that they've had to maintain the illusion of freedom and choice, and make a more educated peasant believe they have super-duper for realz democracy. They use to only have to indoctrinate everyone with religion, then associate the feudalists with the cult, saying they are "chosen to god".

What Trump and MAGA represent is a reversion to the religious level of indoctrination — the cult like indoctrination of China, Russia, or NK —where they can remove the entire system that would enable legitimate democracy (if our options weren't predetermined by wealth), while maintaining the belief of freedom™️ and democracy™️... with thunderous applause.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

A plutocratic oligarchy

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

too bad the cops can't arrest him badly and tase him while he aready has a knee pressing down his neck and get a full gun unloaded at him after an acorn hits a cybertruck, setting it on fire.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago

I feel like this headline is like The Onions' "No Way To Prevent This"; they can just keep on reusing it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I’ll play the advocate here. What good would persecution do now? They wouldn’t stop him in time. All that would do is allow Trump and Musk to claim political persecution.

And if they did start an investigation, would it be complete before the election? What if they filed charges before? So what.

Smart play is to wait. Win. Prosecute with four years of time ahead.

Basically… maybe they will do something still?

There are three decisions a leader can make: Yes, no, not right now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›