this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3031 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

The more interesting story imho, was that the don was 3 hours late to his preorganised rally and didn't tell them until it started because he did the joe Rogan show instead

So everyone was standing out in the cold, and would have been pissed off to get that message.

Just a huge amount of disrespect for his own followers who would have been pissed off to discover they put in the effort to rally for him for nothing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

He could literally piss on them and they would cop it with a grin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well why should he give a shit about them, there nothing be can do to lose them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At least when he played his video where he implies they're not important, lots of people got the hint and started leaving

I do suspect that some may have gotten the hint this time.

Also, jeezus don, when you're going to fuck over your attendees, get someone else to write your "apology" (I use the word loosely because it was really a f u video)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Yet they’ll probably still vote tor him.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Is that show live? I wouldn't be surprised if the crowd was listening to it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Huge rally crowd. The biggest we’ve ever seen. Much bigger crowds than Sleepy Donald.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I prefer Dallying Donnie.

Works on multiple levels… kept his supporters waiting, and the long line of indiscretions….

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

You know who also had huge crowds? Bernie Sanders, it did not bring enough people out to vote. So please fucking vote! Vote like our lives depend on it because they fucking do. If Trump wins America is done for it will be the end.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

a pta bake sale has a bigger crowd than the diaper.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If it was really a Beyonce concert, then it appears Beyonce fans all support Harris for president? Because I don’t usually see that type of banner/headwear at music concerts. So congrats, republicans, at getting 30,000 people at a Beyonce concert to rally behind the Democrats… in Texas.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump campaign communications director Steven Cheung argued in a post to X, formerly Twitter, that the event was really "a Beyonce concert,"

You picked right up on that marching order, didn't ya.
Guess you need to latch on to something since neither Cheeto benito or kid-rock can draw crowds like that...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Was that the sound of a “whoosh” I heard?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Beyoncé doesn’t even sing at her concerts anymore apparently!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Trump, who frequently touts his rally crowd sizes and has claimed without evidence that Harris uses artificial intelligence to boost her crowd numbers, was also in Texas on Friday. He reportedly spoke to a far more modest crowd of around 100 supporters in Austin before recording a podcast interview with Joe Rogan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's just not that impressive... Trump had 29,000 people out of McDonald's recently. /s obviously

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Harris headlined a jam-packed event, attended by around 23,000 people in Clarkston, Georgia, on Thursday night, beating out her campaign's previous attendance record of about 17,000 in Greensboro, North Carolina, last month."

That really isn't anything to brag about.

Bernie Sanders 2015 - 19,000 people inside the arena, 9,000 lined up outside unable to get in, and that was still in the primary.

https://www.cnn.com/2015/08/10/politics/bernie-sanders-portland-rally-19000-2016/index.html

Barack Obama 2008, 75,000. Still the primary.

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/19/us/politics/19campaign.html

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Democrats draw bigger crowds in blue city, than red states...my man both those examples are from keep portland weird oregon...you don't get much bluer than my hometown

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

beyonce didnt hurt either

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Newsweek - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Newsweek:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that articles from Newsweek pre-2013 are generally reliable for news covered during that time. In 2011, Newsweek was a reputable magazine with only some minor problems while it was owned by The Newsweek Daily Beast Company (which also owned The Daily Beast). Blogs under Newsweek, including The Gaggle, should be handled with the WP:NEWSBLOG policy. See also: Newsweek (2013–present).
Wiki: mixed - Unlike articles before 2013, Newsweek articles since 2013 are not generally reliable. From 2013 to 2018, Newsweek was owned and operated by IBT Media, the parent company of International Business Times. IBT Media introduced a number of bad practices to the once reputable magazine and mainly focused on clickbait headlines over quality journalism. Its current relationship with IBT Media is unclear, and Newsweek's quality has not returned to its status prior to the 2013 purchase. Many editors have noted that there are several exceptions to this standard, so consensus is to evaluate Newsweek content on a case-by-case basis. In addition, as of April 2024, Newsweek has disclosed that they make use of AI assistance to write articles. See also: Newsweek (pre-2013).


MBFC: Right-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-breaks-her-own-rally-crowd-record-24-hours-1975300
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's too bad the media didn't cover Bernie like this.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Bernie would have taxed and regulated the media and it's owners. The coverage disparity is intentional.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

What we need is a president to pull a bait and switch. Gotta play the long game though.

Kamala got so many donations she literally can't spend it all before election day. Next best thing? Get more democrats elected at the state level so we can get good bills actually passed.

Maybe then we can start fixing shit.