this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
-1 points (0.0% liked)

politics

19134 readers
5485 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election#Results_by_state

For example, in California, 61.73% voted Democrat, 1.96% Green – if Clinton hadn't stolen those votes, Stein would have easily defeated Clinton

Michigan: Clinton got 47.27%, Trump 47.50%, Stein 1.07% – so if Clinton hadn't stolen those votes, she wouldn't have wrecked the Stein campaign

Democrats are on record saying they want to keep Stein off the ballot, which is a threat to democracy.

They are launching attack ads.... and you lot are still denying that they're deliberately trying to make her lose. That's their whole plan, it's so obvious.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What kind of utter nonsense are you talking about?

Of course they want Stein off the ballot. She's a spoiler candidate funded by Russians and trumpists who are trying to get Trump back into the White House. She's not a legitimate candidate, she has no chance of winning, and she has personally destroyed the credibility of the green party.

E: Oh I get it. You're being sarcastic. Alright this is kind of funny.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

USA Today - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for USA Today:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Wikipedia - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Wikipedia:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/11/jill-stein-ad-third-party-presidential-candidates-2024/75625798007/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election#Results_by_state
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago

A vote for Clinton took a vote from Stein and gave it to trump. That's how trump won.