Being labeled as Satoshi Nakamoto is basically a fucking death sentence due to how much money is on the line. It feels deeply irresponsible of HBO.
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
81 points (93.5% liked)
News
23296 readers
3301 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Very likely not him, and he's like the 20th candidate whose been paraded by the news
Sorry, why is it a death sentence?
He potentially has billions of dollars in bitcoin
Bad people do bad things for big sums of money
But ... there are other billionaires out there who are not going into hiding because they are billionaires.
You can't torture the money away from most billionaires. Someone who has most of their wealth in Bitcoin theoretically could have that happen to them.
And after stealing the money, there's not that much chance of getting caught, unlike if you just tried putting billions into your regular ass bank account.
You can't torture the money away from most billionaires
Have you tried though?
I'd like to.
Other billionaires also have security. The accused people who aren't really Satoshi likely don't have the means to properly protect themselves the same way.
Yea - Taylor Swift, as an example, has serious security around her due to her wealth and also the personal threats she's received... that doesn't come cheap.
Satoshi could liquidate 4.76% of all the bitcoins that will ever exist, that would wipe the crypto market and potentially bring the stock market along for a very bumpy ride, wipe a ton of money in pension funds and so on.
The fact that one person owns that much Bitcoin should worry anyone who is invested in it.
Yes but having billions in Bitcoin more closely resembles having billions in cash than billions in stocks / other assets which are harder to steal and get away with.
Ironically, that's the kind of "issue" you need trustworthy banks for. The thing crypto was meant to replace. But none of the crypto exchanges that exist are trustworthy enough
I still don't understand why crypto exchanges exist is an unregulated, decentralized currency, wouldn't an exchange remove part of those benefits?
yes!
Yup, if you robbed Elon Musk you'd just walk away with some IOUs that might be worth millions... and also billions in Twitter debt.
The actual Satoshi has billions in untraceable cash equivalents that already happen to be in a currency that drug lords like dealing in.
That was a good read. I haven’t watched the documentary or kept up with this, but the part
Len Sassaman, a cryptographer who moved in similar online circles as Satoshi, as the most likely candidate to be revealed as the Bitcoin creator. Sassaman took his own life in 2011 at the age of 31, shortly after Satoshi disappeared.
seems pretty strongly like the guy to me though. Hopefully the documentary goes into that?
I believe its him. His interview was hilariously awkward and cagey.
I still don't know what Bitcoin is.
A confidence game too many people believe in
Bitcoin was the very first solution to how do you prevent a digital item from being copied and used repeatedly aka double spending.
Nothing digital was truly safe from this until bitcoin as you always had to trust someone who could double spend or steal it if they wanted to, or the database/system being hacked and things altered.
Things became truly immutable once committed to the chain.
The whole system needed an incentive to keep everyone aligned to reject double spends, and the coin itself was the reward. (Edit and there's a limited number of coins, making them scarce)
Miners get rewarded for ensuring transactions are legitimate. It costs money to gain the reward so it's better for them to just keep the reward instead of risking losing it
Edit: it also created the first time we could prove something digital existed at a point in time. Everything before this involved trusting someone data wasn't altered to 'prove' it. Since blocks are immutable, their timestamp proves something existed then. E.g. a hash of a picture. It's irrefutable the picture existed on that day.
A way to milk money from people who don't understand how computers work.
And to snuggle large amounts of wealth in and out of china.
That darn cuddly Chinese money! Just wanna caress it all night long!
Lol. Okay. I leave that typo. Just for that answer it is worth it.
Xi dressed as Charmin bear
Your typo makes it sound like they're doing something terribly cute!
"Money" that's only used to buy drugs or try to get rich quick.