this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5580 readers
263 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 44 minutes ago

It's almost like if people are able to mature enough to make an informed choice, they get a choice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

well that is because shareholders are wetting their pants realizing that with low birth rates they are losing both slaves and customers. Well, jokes on them, it is because of the shitty world they spearheaded (and that we followed)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

That person and the author of the article obviously suck at reading/understanding crafts. Teen pregnancies did not have a high enough percentage (and it’s good that it went down).

Also, how do you miss the drop in the age range 20 - 24 and the rise in the age ranges above 30. It’s even indicated in the title to “40 is the new 20”.

This is indicative of a bad economy. I bet if you add a graph showing the rise in rent, you will see an inverse correlation.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

I think this is where a lot of modern civilization is falling apart at. If you want population replacement and growth, you actually have to make it advantageous to have children, and at appropriate age for your society and culture. The GOP thinks they can do it by destroying reproductive rights, civil rights, and marriage laws, if they harm women enough they'll HAVE to be baby makers! Dehumanized baby factories! And even conservative voters are fighting against it, because it's insane and it's against our current culture. It has to work for everyone. It would be more intelligent to create free childcare, better pregnancy and birth leave for both parents, and child tax credits. They could use WIC to absorb the cost of having a child and public education sooner with preschool. If people are hopeful their children will have high education access and a stable life they will be a lot more likely to have kids. Being horrified that your children will live in a fascist theocracy and intentionally kept uneducated and poverty stricken, they might actually voluntarily avoid sex to not have kids.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

What if we don't want infinite growth? What about stability? Or (gasp) a population reduction so we don't destroy the planet. Have less babies. Feed the ones we have. Educate them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

Sure, easing into a deflating population over several hundred years is fine but tanking it and ending up with a society having to support a vastly older population ain't easy either. Better for governments to provide positive reasons to have children but there's zero chance of that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago

I mean yes, children should be an affordable option and please take my tax money to make it practically free. But also I think a lot more people don't want children than is generally assumed it expected. Just lots of societal pressure pushing vulnerable people to make a decision that's not necessarily in their best interest.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

Let's not pretend the GOP are doing it for the good of humanity....

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think this is where a lot of modern civilization is falling apart at. If you want population replacement and growth, you actually have to make it advantageous to have children, and at appropriate age for your society and culture.

For most of history it wasn't advantageous to have children. People just didn't have many options, and we were used to babies dying all the time so if we wanted any help in our old age we had to have enough to survive into adulthood.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago

Where do you base this information from?

E.g. people who had a farm or crafts/trade business usually had children to help and later take over the business. Having children to help at old age is mentioned by yourself.

Sounds quite advantageous to me. Especially when labor is more physically demanding or you need enough people to maintain security like for traders etc.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Been there. What are you drinking? I'm sipping on some Bushmills Black (sherry cask). Got a bit project out today. Spent a year writing this beast:

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

What is a CKJ unified icograph? And why don't you have any?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago

Chinese characters. Presumably they're not Chinese, Japanese or Korean.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 hours ago

PDF Xchange! It's fucking amazing. My work switched from Adobe because it does more and costs like $2 a licence vs $150 for Adobe

load more comments
view more: next ›