this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)

okmatewanker

583 readers
169 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French ๐Ÿคฎ

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

East anglia would win on account of being able to punch with all six fingers.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I object to having Nottingham in my group those guys would be more of a hindrance than anything else.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Meatshields for Smoggie berserkers to get in close.

[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

A united England could only take a divided Scotland by marrying into it.

The outcome is clear, Scotland sweeps then starts fighting itself.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Boy those Scots sure a contentious bunch.

[โ€“] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

those Scots sure a contentious bunch.

You just made an enemy for life!

[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Northern Ireland doesn't get its own zone because the outcome would be too obvious otherwise.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

They'd kill each other at the first chance.

[โ€“] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If there's booze involved, then definitely 13.

If there's no booze allowed... 13.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

Idk, I feel like if it's total population of zones almost everywhere is at a disadvantage to London. If it's champions style and there's a set number of people in the brawl, definitely 13.

[โ€“] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

10 has Liverpool, Manchester and Leeds. I reckon the only real challenge would be 13 but combining forces they could take Glasgow and then pick of any lone Highland madman.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

10 has a huge numerical advantage over Glasgow, and we could counter their casuals with Mancunian spiceheads. The scousers could be a liability or an asset, but then someone has to stand at the front and get mown down by the initial Highland berzerker charge.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

The scousers could be a liability or an asset, but then someone has to stand at the front and get mown down by the initial Highland berzerker charge.

A phalanx of Bootle smackheads would be like trying to punch through a horde of the zombies. No weapons for headshots means the Scots would wear themselves out. If they bought a supply of methadone, they'd probably be able to turn a few too.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the women from 13 get involved, 13.

They will be using readily available objects as weapons however.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Then they'd be disqualified, as it's "no weapons".

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Didn't the English already try this and yall eventually wound up with the UK?

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

That was largely done with good old bribing people to be on your side, its also how we got the British empire as it basically started with paying various groups in India to fight eachother which is what allowed the British to conquer a nation that was far wealthier and more powerful at the time.