this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19043 readers
587 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

This is a real head scratcher.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago

Cornel West 2024!!!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago

A piece shit likes the smell of their own.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, 100%. Because it's ironic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago

Yes, because they understand what a threat to their own existence Trump is. They are doing it out of self interest.

David Duke just likes Jill Stein's views lmao.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's fairly obvious who the more fascist candidate is here. I think it says something that Trump is too fascist for Cheney.

Also, shoving Stein's words in her face doesn't mean OP agrees with those words, just that Stein's words are particularly problematic at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

Cheney almost certainly is concerned about Trump mismanaging US foreign policy, not his fashiness.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Stein's campaign says it wants nothing to do with Duke, the former American Nazi Party member

That is how it is done.

Unlike Harris who went on a parade with Liz Cheney, and praised Dick Cheney for his work after they endorsed her.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

You do know that you need the other party’s voters to jump ship to win the election, right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

So why did Jill Stein reject David Duke's endorsement?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 hours ago

You can also appeal to the disaffected Leftists jumping ship, or the non-voters. You don't need to campaign to the right of your predecessor.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Dems already have the other party's candidate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

No more burnin no more hangin. From now on we will compost the bodies. #GreenHoods

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›