this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19152 readers
4306 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't you think he looks tired?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Get fucking Harriet Jones’d lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Politics is so basic

  1. Polling shows electorate are concerned about age of candidates
  2. ditch aged candidate
  3. attack opponents aged candidate
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
  1. Parties attack either other for having aged candidates.
  2. Party ditches aged candidate, since electorate doesn't want aged candidate--other party doubles down on old/mentally declining candidate and refuses to reconsider
  3. Party attacks aged candidate
  4. Omg who could have seen that coming
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Like I said, basic.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yup. One side proved they were actually concerned about the age of the candidates and did something about it while the other digs their heads in the sand and ignores reality.

Sure seems to be a super common theme these days...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So when did this “actual concern” begin ?

It was never mentioned until the Hur report raised doubts. Then Biden received fulsome support from the party.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Wtf planet are you on dude?

Say the name of the Democratic presidential nominee:

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The Hur report alleviated doubts. What the fuck are you talking about

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why so aggressive?

Hur said of Biden “he’s and elderly man with a poor memory”

Following that, he was roundly supported by the party.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Did you ignore the congressional hearing where it was demonstrated that Hur lied and omitted facts to spin that narrative?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

You just said he alleviated doubts …..but now you say he was found to be lying ?

What are you trying to say ?

Look, a few weeks ago, the democrats went out of their way to defend a doddery old man and told you everything was fine. Then when polling data changed, They kicked him out him, and started using age and infirmity as an attack line.

If you don’t see hypocrisy in that, and you don’t see the lack of integrity in that, and the general cheap shittery in that, then you are part of the great unthinking electorate .

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, its bizarre. Its almost as if the sections of electorate that complained about age never really cared about i the first place.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

They'd vote for a mummified dementia donnie if they could.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

He's as old and decrepit as he made Biden out to be.

Of course they're desperate to hide it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Every accusation is a confession, as per standard procedure.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Of course it is. He bragged that he struggled at the dementia test only for the last few questions, half a decade ago.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=yVpsTa_dnSc&t=110s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

The difference is that with Biden, it was something new and recent. Trump's been like that for decades at least. It's hard to say that it's because of his age, but that doesn't change the end result.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

MSNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for MSNBC:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opinion/trump-age-old-harris-medical-records-rcna175033
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Dotard Trump

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Democrats don’t want voter ID. You know why? Because they wanna cheat. They don’t wanna — I say, ‘Ohhh, they don’t wanna.’ When I first — I thought I was seeing things, I thought I was ... like, I didn’t hear that when I first start this who — they’d say, ‘The Democrats will not approve voter ID.’

— A stable genius

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Got the whole team in tonight. seppos on high alert it seems

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So is most of the "liberal media", too, apparently. For a while there, nearly all I heard about was age. Then, suddenly, during the summer, that ceased.

Weird. I wonder what happened? Meanwhile, dementia donnie seems to be losing it more and more by the day.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

They get paid more this way. That’s the real truth.