What the actual fuck???
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Honestly, concerns over the possibility that religion might be a political opponent and trying to neutralize it by replacing figures with one's own are not new.
It's just a little unusual to have it happening in 2024 between gods and secular leaders.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_syncretism
Religious syncretism is the blending of religious belief systems into a new system, or the incorporation of other beliefs into an existing religious tradition.
This can occur for many reasons, where religious traditions exist in proximity to each other, or when a culture is conquered and the conquerors bring their religious beliefs with them, but do not succeed in eradicating older beliefs and practices.
Are you surprised???
More flabbergasted, really.
Same shit, different century. Ever look up the actual history of Christmas or Easter? They were pagan holidays and Christian rulers forced everyone to jam as much Christian stuff into them as they could.
It's literally one of the oldest tricks in the book.
Good thing all the sources are from US based institutions and NGOs. Must mean they are completely factual and unbiased.
I was so hoping to see pictures of mother Mao hold baby Xi
Lmao that's fucking hilarious.
NK levels of brain rot here we come!
Right on track to repeat the horrors of the past with complete blind faith in himself.
I can't wait to watch him fall on his face royally.
I can't wait to go Christmaos Jinping this year! They just put in a new Target in the workers quarter.
Maohammed when?
As a Muslim this is one of the times I'm glad paintings of humans and animals are haram in Islam. We don't got none of that shit in mosques (or anywhere else, really).
Yeah Muslims are a bit sensitive when it comes these kinds of things
That's like saying "catholics are a bit sensitive when it comes to eating meat on fridays". It's a nonsense statement
I think Muslims take this more seriously because, as someone who grew up in a region where most people identified Catholic (and most of the rest just had no religion) but didn't practice much, I wasn't even aware of that rule.
Well you could look at incidence where things got out of hand like the "Muhammad cartoons crisis".
Or just look what happened in Sweden with the Quran
That's one of the dumber things I've heard today. Luckily it's still early, plenty more dumb stuff to read.
the spectre of communism immaculately impregnated mao, who gave birth to xi.
the father son and holy ghost
The father, the son, the Winnie the Pooh.
The holy Xinity
Please someone paint a Mohammed with Mao or Xi’s face on it :)
Hey, finally, a religion tankies are comfortable with!
Upon further consideration, it was decided that perhaps what Marx had meant was that certain varieties of opium were, in fact, good for the people.
That's not even a Chinese innovation. At least the Chinese gave Mao a proper burial instead of desecrating his corpse Christian saint/Lenin style.
Replace Mary in the manger with Mao. Now Mao is giving birth to Jesus. Weirdo.
Replace baby Jesus with adult Mao in the manger.
I wouldn't be able to stop laughing in that church.
Which one is Mary, and which Jesus?
Obviously Mao is Mary, giving birth to Xi the Jesus, that will be betrayed by his own government.
Can't say China is anti lgbt now as Mao Zhedong is trans all along.
Mao Nodong
Mother Mao-ry and little baby Xi-sus.
I need to see the nativity scene version of this! But with Xi's old face on baby Jesus.
she came into the manger, way overdue,
and plonked herself down next to the ewe.
then -- leaning back on the cow --
did she, the great chairman mao,
immaculately embirth winnie the pooh.
I had to double check to see if this was an onion article.
To be honest, I don't trust The Telegraph any more than I trust The Onion. At least The Onion is straightforward about what they are.
Daily Telegraph (UK) - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Daily Telegraph (UK):
MBFC: Right - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source
Search topics on Ground.News
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2024/10/05/xi-and-mao-replace-jesus-and-mary-in-chinese-churches/
I think this is good actually
Hail, ~~Mary~~ Mao, full of grace,
the Lord is with thee.
Blessed art thou amongst women
and blessed is the fruit of thy womb, ~~Jesus~~ Xi.
Holy ~~Mary~~ Mao, Mother of God,
pray for us sinners,
now and at the hour of our death.
Amen.
Hail, ~~Mary~~ Mao, full of grace...
I watched "The Man in the High Castle", and the Christian imagery and symbolism in a former Christian Church were replaced with Nazi symbolism. I thought it was a bit farfetched, but now hearing something similar being done by China as part of totalitarianism, it is rather spooky. I've heard religious buildings being destroyed, but converting places of worship and blatantly removing its past to align with state ideology is far more surreal and haunting, and I am an agnostic atheist.