this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38826 readers
2110 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Putting the AI in AIR line

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

AI doing air traffic control work?

Jesus fucking Christ, what could possibly go wrong?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why do you think this is going to replace air traffic control work? It's picking which gate to park the plane at. This was done by airline and airport operations teams, not ATC. Imagine if you could automatically pick gates to reduce the time a plane spends taxiing and/or minimize time passengers spend walking. That's 100% a useful application for computer optimization algorithms. Humans aren't going to do that better and it's not a function of safety that tower or ground control needs to do.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

all that's fine and good, but one just needs to see your username to fathom what could potentially go wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I feel like ATC is one of those pattern-recognition constraint-satisfaction problem jobs where a (non-generative!) algorithm can probably do a pretty good job.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Everything they are doing has known algorithms. Some are np problems though, but ai isn't any better for those than the existing algorithyms. but ai is hype today so everyone needs to do it. In a few years this will die off and ai will be used for where it is useful. Just like every other ai that has been a fad for a while since 1950.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

LLMs and generative AI aren't going to be any good on this problem. The article is using the older, non-buzzword computer science meaning, which includes algorithms for this exact problem, such as the ones used for a category of difficult problems known as constraint satisfaction problems. These problems were artificial intelligence problems before the term "AI" was turned into a marketing buzzword.

Allocating gates is one problem that traditional computers and algorithms struggle to do quickly, with calculation times increasing disproportionately to the size of the problem.

But, Dr Doetsch is confident that approaches using quantum computing will crush the problem.

"Quantum algorithms will allow optimally assigning gates, and other resources, even in large airports and travel networks. These algorithms will be able to respond to changing external factors with updated optimal solutions in real time," he says.

This stuff is cool, and has nothing to do with generative AI.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

BBC News - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for BBC News:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c80e54yjzdmo
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But not at the expense of safety, right?

Right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right:

The system uses machine learning to assign arriving aircraft to the nearest available gate with the shortest taxi time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Sooooooooo standard tree search that comp science students were doing in the 80s?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So it uses 20 high power Nvidia GPU's instead of running on a single 5 watt microcontroller!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

How about you shut the fuck up and pay me money for this service you don't need, and no-one asked for?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd imagine it would be more like CPU scheduling than tree traversal, but according to the article they just do it by hand now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same difference- it's a solved optimization problem that does not need "machine learning".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Yeah, but it would be fun to figure out what they actually end up doing vs the marketing hype.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Another problem that has been solved years ago with regular old algorithms and properly designed airports.

AI not gonna solve crap when your entire timetable collapses because one flight got delayed and you refused to spend money to use additional gates or upgrade an antiquated 90s system.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Please read the article. They are talking about an improvement over existing algorithms by using quantum computing.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

quantum computing

that's even more of a pipe dream than AI

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, and it's also scalable because it uses the blockchain, you know, on the cloud, via 5g.

Jesus christ almighty.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Though they'll still use the fucking ridiculous boarding groups that slow down embarking just to make rich people feel special, right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Just to make extra money you mean

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know "rich" means a lot of different things to a lot of different people, but "paying for priority boarding" should not be included in a reasonable definition of the word.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It absolutely should be - it gives you no reasonable value... you don't get there any faster - and having priority boarding (outside of for those with kids/disabilities) makes everything slower for everyone. It is absolutely the most frivolous luxury.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a frivolous luxury that costs like $20 extra per ticket. For most people that's just personal preference.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For twenty bucks you might be moving yourself from group 7 to group 5 - it costs hundreds or thousands to reach group 1.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you mean flying first class? Because that's different than priority boarding. They are in a different section of the plane, and the people there are paying for a lot more things than boarding.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yea, that's my point - you're paying 20 bucks to be the most special of the pleblians... you're not even shifting significantly in the boarding process - you're just paying money to be the person who stood up near the gate first.

And the fact that some people are willing to pay is why we have eight boarding groups now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Okay but it's 20 bucks. The person paying it is probably a relatively regular person attempting to feel special. A rich person is just buying a first class ticket without a second thought, and then arriving at the last possible second to board after chilling at the airport lounge. A really rich person isn't flying commercial.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

100% even if I get like a or b group I still don't board til the end. Does me no good getting on the plane before everyone if I have an assigned seat. I usually have just a backpack with me and don't need to waste my time with the stupid overhead bin. Southwest was the only airline where boarding made sense and now they're fucking that up too.