this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
162 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

58691 readers
3916 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Clearly, Google is serious about trying to oust ad blockers from its browser, or at least those extensions with fuller (V2) levels of functionality. One of the crucial twists with V3 is that it prevents the use of remotely hosted code – as a security measure – but this also means ad blockers can’t update their filter lists without going through Google’s review process. What does that mean? Way slower updates for said filters, which hampers the ability of the ad-blocking extension to keep up with the necessary changes to stay effective.

(This isn’t just about browsers, either, as the war on advert dodgers extends to YouTube, too, as we’ve seen in recent months).

At any rate, Google is playing with fire here somewhat – or Firefox, perhaps we should say – as this may be the shove some folks need to get them considering another of the best web browsers out there aside from Chrome. Mozilla, the maker of Firefox, has vowed to maintain support for V2 extensions, while introducing support for V3 alongside to give folks a choice (now there’s a radical idea).

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

So glad I peaced out on Chrome in like 2016 over the ugly curved tabs

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've fully switched to Firefox everywhere. The only thing I'm missing is a lightweight browser which is not based on chromium for my potato tablet. jQuarks viewer is a good one but can be dumb sometimes, it opens image instead of the link for eg.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not sure if they're still round, but I used to use opera.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

If only banks and government websites moved their asses and stopped mentioning Internet Explorer for one more time...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Google, fuck you and your ads too:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Why did they let an extension that blatantly undermines their goals onto the chrome store in the first place?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (9 children)

What's a good YouTube downloader these days?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

yt-dlp is the gold standard. Not only for YouTube either. Check out the man page, the amount of shit it can do is insane.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

yt-dlp continues to be the best option for me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

yt-dlp is what i normally use, tho its only got a command line interface. I think someone's made a GUI for it, but I've never tried it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A great privacy focused client for YouTube is FreeTube. Uses a native API or Invidious for playback, and you can download and share videos from it. Doesn't give any identifying info to Google/YouTube and I've never once dealt with an ad. For mobile, Grayjay and NewPipe are similar apps.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Doesn't uBlock Origin already have a Manifest V3 version of the extension?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

That's uBlock Origin Lite, which the developer already stated is grossly inadequate for ad blocking.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Yes, but capabilities are reduced.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Just stop destroying the www by supporting this toxic monopoly. How in the hell are all of those coping tweaks easier than just switching the freaking browser?! It's like Windows users claiming superiority when they have to have like 10 tools to tweak their operating system, with each year another new one being needed. At what point do you people realize how much you're getting duped and how you are part of the problem that makes this possible in the first place?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How dare anyone suggest that there's a way to accomplish something!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's better to just use another browser that's not looking to exploit you

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah from one of those companies that pour tons of money into developing and maintaining a web browser without any way to recoup that expense.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For those who may not want to click the link, this appears to show a workaround that enterprises might use to bypass the change.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, enterprises would use the Google admin console as described here.

The above is for a single machine, applied locally.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It looks like it’s the same flag to me. I mean, it’s entirely possible that administration could use a different path to applying the setting, but it has the same name.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Sure, it's the same flag, but using the admin console would apply it to a group of computers. The methods in the github link are to apply it to a single computer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

suddenly 20 new chromium forks appear

Huh, where'd those come from, I wonder. 🤔

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›