this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

politics

19047 readers
583 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

South Western’s elected school board is making some strange decisions.

For the last two years, they’ve fixated on which bathrooms LGBTQ+ kids use. In 2023, officials in this Hanover-area district played musical chairs with school bathrooms in a misguided attempt to appease the loudest bigots among them — ending up with five different types of bathrooms.

After a low-turnout school board election in which several far-right members joined their ranks, they hired a Christian law firm, decided to begin banning books and reopened the bathroom issue. Board President Matthew Gelazela, who was elevated to his post after previously serving as the board’s most vocal bomb-thrower, pointed to Red Lion’s discriminatory policies as something to aspire to.

Now, upon the advice of that law firm — the Harrisburg-based Independence Law Center — the board approved spending $8,700 to cut windows so passersby can look into the so-called “gender-identity” student bathrooms.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Yeah... Protect me from those creeps watching my kid in the bathroom.. wait..

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do all these weirdos have gendered bathrooms in their homes? Just install single person non gendered bathrooms or floor to ceiling stalls and non connected sinks and be done with it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I point out that communal bathrooms are the problem every time this type of nonsense shows up

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I think the problem is the bigotry, personally.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does $9,000 seem a bit low for the cost of adding windows to all the relevant restrooms in a school district?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Eh. Sawzall through cinder-block, pre-built window and frame, some caulk. Sure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ah, this takes me back to my own high school days back in the 90s where none of the boys' toilet stalls had doors on them. I assume as some sort of anti-masturbation tactic. I've got nervous bathroom issues already so I basically held it in until I got home most of the time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We had a bunch of stalls in the 90s without doors, but the janitors told us it was just because asshole kids would break the doors for fun and the school would run out of money to repair them.

Even just partially damaging a door can make it a dangerous enough that the school would rather take it down than risk a lawsuit.

Made more sense to me than some sort of anti masturbation strategy. High school kids are fucking dumb as shit and I can definitely imagine them breaking stall doors for fun

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Curtain rods and opaque shower curtains it is then. The more they get stolen the more kid like they get replaced with until they have to shit looking at Dora the Explorer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It only just occurred to me that bathroom stalls in the schools almost never have any marketing on them like they do at shopping centres, ours certainly don't.

Which isn't weird, (obviously don't want corporate marketing into schools) but at home you hang stuff in your bathroom when you have kids- map of the world, vexology poster, dinosaur poster, etc, and I'm always trying to find a way to force my students to actually look at the term calendar in advance instead of being suprised that there's a scheduled assessment today.

I'm replacing the soap in the bathrooms every day, how has it never occurred to me to slap a poster on the back of the door so the students have something to look at, I've got so many posters with no wall space too!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a pretty awesome idea. Just know that it's going to get defaced so you'll likely have to replace it every now and then.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

These posters are destined for the recycling bin (they're the old ones from the main classroom) so if anything it might reduce damage to other things if people are defacing the poster instead.

though in saying that, we don't have a tagging issue at our centre - I've rarely had to remove graffiti from toilets, it's only the soap dispensers that keep getting messed with here, but ripping the posters is also fine, if it makes someone less tempted to rip the soap off the wall.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Well that's cool, I like seeing educators this involved.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

It helps that I work in community ed, there are 5 people on our entire faculty, so we litteraly all do a little bit of every job there is to do at an education centre.

My payslips look hilarious because I get paid 8 different rates per week depending on what I'm actually doing, admin, custodial, teaching, etc.

But this is the style of chaotic yet whole-ass-in education that drives me. I would quickly burn out at a more structured school-based workplace.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I went through 4 years of high school without ever taking a shit at school for this very reason.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You only need two types of bathrooms. One for standing while peeing and the other for sitting. That's the only way bathrooms need to be divided.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I noticed neither of your stated options has windows.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Well no...that would be weird.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For a lot of women the bathroom is the only way to escape unwanted male attention.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

But that's not what bathrooms are for. I lament the state of our society that has so many women scared of men and I do what (little) I can to be a good ally.

But bathrooms are for expelling biological waste from one of three holes in the human body. And for washing afterwards. For that purpose, single occupancy toilet stalls (with floor to ceiling walls) and communal sinks is sufficient.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I prefer to have open bathrooms. The only secure room is the stall itself (along the wall) and once you’re done, you step out to the bank of handwashing stations across from the stalls in the open. You’re never IN the bathroom with others as it’s out in the open.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are always gaps in the doors. You can clearly see in the stall from that cut out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Never been to Europe, I see.

It's entirely possible to have floor to ceiling doors for bathroom privacy, you see it plenty in Europe. That being said, gaps in stalks have always been weird to me. I don't need anyone trying to figure out who is taking a dump through the gap

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh I know it's only an American thing. It's so weird.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Iirc it's because of the American fire code. If it's a complete door, it's a "room" and needs a fire detector/sprinkler. Too expensive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

That seems to be what they are going for here. Instead of using the space as one shared restroom with a hand washing station and 4 stalls, they are converting it into 4 private restrooms, with a shared hand washing station in a "public area" outside the restrooms.

So long as they build actual walls and use actual doors on the ~~stalls~~ "private restrooms", this isn't a completely terrible idea.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

They are out of their minds

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

York Dispatch - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for York Dispatch:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.yorkdispatch.com/story/opinion/editorials/2024/10/02/bathrooms-with-a-view-cutting-windows-into-student-restrooms-is-a-new-level-of-weird/75479753007/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

And the school board president ran as a member of the "Libertarian Party".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In case anyone else was wondering how they came up with 5 types of bathroom:

bathrooms for males assigned as male at birth, females assigned as female at birth, males based on gender identity, females based on gender identity, and private, single-use bathrooms for all students to use.

Source

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›