Dear reader, when you read OP's posts, take the time to look at the upvote to downvote percentage. This poster is going out of its way to bash Democrats, and while we can't say why that is (thanks mods!!!), we CAN say that there is a concerted effort by Republicans, Russians, right-wing trolls, and other authoritarians to throw this election to Trump to establish authoritarianism here. Keep that in mind as you read these articles from this poster.
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19102 readers
2631 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Isn't it that we just are not allowed to say they are bots or paid provocateurs? I thought we still were allowed to say they are dishonest, acting in bad faith, and MAGAs cosplaying as leftists.
Hi there, friend. Don't you think that's an unfair insinuation to make? OP doesn't write the articles, they only post them for discussion. Thank you!
I’m not sure all purpose is a great substitute for universal.
I don't know what that means friend. I'm just here to discuss the articles and totally nothing else. Thank you!
I think you’d really be into Danielle Prune’s politics.
Who is that? Something something duopoly btw. Thanks!
Actually I'm helping the Democrats: https://lemmy.world/comment/12698046
@SatansMaggotyCumFart says "I’ve been a stanch socialist for years, always voting for the SWPUSA but I can’t wait to vote for Harris this year."
"I’m a proud democrat now due to your conduct in these comments."
and
"You’re definitely doing a great job drumming up support for Harris!"
All that and you didn't even make it easy for people to check my posts! Here's my post history: https://lemmy.world/u/UniversalMonk?page=1&sort=New&view=Posts
How can you say I bash Democrats when I post Pro-democrat articles though? And I’ve posted articles that are critical of Trump, Stein, and Harris, as well as articles praising each of them.
So, if you’re assuming I agree with every viewpoint in the articles I post, how does that even work when I share so many conflicting perspectives?!
I also created and mod a political news community where people have posted articles praising Harris, criticizing Stein and Trump, and trashing me—yet I still leave those up.
https://lemmy.world/c/politicsunfiltered
Why did you forget to mention the pro-democrat articles and the anti-Trump articles that I post, in your little rant?
Do you have an agenda? Hlmmmm.... because we CAN say that there is a concerted effort by Republicans, Russians, right-wing trolls, and other authoritarians to try to paint everyone as some russian agent in order to cause chaos and confusion. So readers, please keep that in mind as you read these posts attempting to paint me as pro-Trump. :)
Some instances don't show downvotes (like blahaj.zone). Also, maybe they're bashing Democrats bc Dems are fucking awful? Not as bad as republicans obviously, but that should go without saying around here. Leftists shitting on Biden and refusing to vote for him seems to have played an important role in him stepping down and, until he did, we were constantly shat on by liberals over it and accused of being Russian/trolls/etc. This is the same. Harris needs to adopt leftist positions if she wants leftist support
Edit: I am aware, however, that OP likes to troll. Their style is classic (i.e., obvious yet still reels people in) and it's hilarious
*which are 1% of the US population
They make a significant number of voters in critical swing states like Michigan. Biden won certain counties in the 2020 election by a handful of votes. This can make a significant amount of difference in the coming election.
I'm aware, but this particular poster constantly posts these articles with that specific title format to push a very specific reaction.
And gets downvoted by ridiculous measures, which I'm glad for.
And yet, I'm still here. Because I don't care about downvotes, friend. Seems like they are very important to you tho. Thanks!
Yes you're quite proud of being loathed
Because I don’t care about downvotes, friend. Seems like they are very important to you tho. Thanks!
For the record, I'm actually helping Harris and the Democrats win. I've turned people to the Democratic party just by my comments and attitude: https://lemmy.world/comment/12698046
@SatansMaggotyCumFart says "I’ve been a stanch socialist for years, always voting for the SWPUSA but I can’t wait to vote for Harris this year."
"I’m a proud democrat now due to your conduct in these comments."
and
"You’re definitely doing a great job drumming up support for Harris!"
I didn't write the article, nor did I write the title. If you think the news org is being dishonest, please contact them directly.
And why did you neglect to mention that I’ve posted articles that are critical of Trump, Stein, and Harris, as well as articles praising each of them?
So, if you’re assuming I agree with every viewpoint in the articles I post, how does that even work when I share so many conflicting perspectives?!
I'm curious why you left that part out. Can you clarify why you would imply that I only post one type of article, when my post history clearly shows that's not true? https://lemmy.world/u/UniversalMonk?page=1&sort=New&view=Posts
Because I don't spend my time thinking about you and feeling I need to check in on what you're doing and posting.
Well you cared enough to mention "this particular poster constantly posts these articles with that specific title format to push a very specific reaction."
But when I point out to you that I post all types of articles with all types of titles, you suddenly don't spend your time thinking about me?!
So you spend enough time to give out inaccurate implications about me, but not enough to time to be correct. Ok...
Also, I'm still now sure what you mean by "specific title format" since I don't create the titles.
Yep!
In the fifty-six days since this account was created it has made four thousand four hundred and eighty one submissions.
That’s one every eighteen minutes, twenty-four hours a day seven days a week.
The guy who wants to ban Muslims from entering the country is doing better among Muslims than the person who will probably get accused of being a Muslim by a good portion of the country.
Stein leading Harris among this group, even if very unfortunate, makes sense.
But this ... this does not.
And sure enough, the article explains it,
Trump’s lead over Harris, however, are within the margin of error of the poll
So basically it's all just error and he's likely not really leading.