this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
452 points (98.5% liked)

News

23014 readers
17 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

As a medical user, I really hope she will stick to this if elected. Trump is doing more "leave it up to the states" bullshit except specifically for Florida and no other state.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I mean, this won Trudeau 3 elections, so I'd say it's a worth it campaigning point.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Best way to get the young male vote to be honest. Isn't this part of what made Ron Paul popular?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ron Paul wass popular becausue of his racist newsletter back in the 80's. Everything else was just whitewash.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ron Paul wasn't popular because of a racist newsletter. He was popular because the libertarian ideals he espoused were appealing to internet dwellers that hadn't experienced real life yet.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Man, I'm happy someone else might remember that time on Reddit which I could only call "peak cringe". Everyone and their mother seemed to love Ron Paul on that site

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

To me, a European, he was one of the very few, if any, candidates that made sense and seemed consistent in how he voted and spoke. And I consider myself to be quite libertarian.

I don't really understand your remark to be honest, other than shoehorning the "he made a racist remark" thing into the conversation. Perhaps you could elaborate.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The point is that Ron Paul was a true, modern, libertarian in that his "freedom" and "liberty" shtick was always about freedom to do segregation via "freedom of association" and other such nonsense. Ron Paul created the libertarian to fascist pipeline because libertarianism has mever been anything but veiled racism

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Your entire theory hinges on a racist remark that he didn't even write and was possibly unaware of. Unless I'm missing something groundbreaking on page 2 and 3 of that article which I can't read because it's paywalled.

Is there anything Ron Paul did politically that would suggest fascist ideologies? The word is thrown around a lot these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

Been waiting a long time for this.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

boy if i had rights and benefits for every right and benefit Joe Biden "said he backed"

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Boy, if you had basic civics knowledge as to how a president in the executive branch cannot pass laws himself but requires the legislative branch (Congress) to pass said laws that he would back.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Say what you will about the Republicans, at least they get results on their absurd culture war bullshit. Best the Dems can do for the left is ignore us completely and give us Tim Walz as a VP like we should be soooo fucking grateful

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think Tim Walz was chosen to attract left-wing voters. He's not center left or far left.

I agree with you that the Democrats tend to ignore the left, and it's incredible annoying, but at the same time in my opinion Harris is a better candidate than Hillary was. It's a small improvement, but it's an improvement. (Obviously this depends on your views on various issues, so you could disagree reasonably enough.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Actually the power of executive orders are very broad, and as of 2024, are beyond any limits of law. Official acts of a sitting president cannot be criminalized. He can absolutely order the FDA to immediately remove Marijuana from schedule 1 status, but he won't. What carrot would Harris have to dangle in front of us at that point?

For context, yes, I'm a dem, and yes, I'm voting for Harris, but fuck me I'm tired of such transparent posturing.

[–] the_artic_one 1 points 2 weeks ago

Actually the power of executive orders are very broad

Only if the Supreme Court is on your side, otherwise they make up some bullshit about it needing to go through Congress like they did with student loan forgiveness.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago

In before it gets legalized federally and then some republican states start spouting states rights and continue to arrest people that are following the law.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I love how it's a bit of a stretch to back legalising a substance which has become legal in a fair number of states without any issue (that I'm aware of).

How many elections before a candidate is praised for saying something like, "I, unlike the others, am prepared to accept that the populace generally believes that vegetables are part of a healthy diet?", because we live in a world where the vast majority of candidates are just saying any old stupid shit that is viral on social media.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Those states still have dispensaries and grow operations raided all the time, putting people who work at them at risk. There's also the fact that people like me, who need it for medical use, are breaking both state and federal law by going from Indiana to Illinois to buy it. It could potentially put me in federal prison (probably not, but that is the way things stand legally).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The only way I can explain such stupidity is by assuming malice, e.g.: "We must put endless fear into the poor people. Our decisions are moral, theirs are not."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And because of that possibility for malice, it needs to be federally legal.

Cops should not be given tools of oppression.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I fear that cops ARE tools of oppression.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

So you don't give them ways to make it worse for people.

If there was a law allowing cops to drone bomb places where they decided criminal activity was occurring, I would assume you would want that law gone.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think 40 states have medical and 25 have recreational. It's insane that it's even a question about federal legalization at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

without any issue (that I'm aware of).

Not only that, but states and municipalities have made a killing on taxing it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Good it needs to be done.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Biden went somewhere on this?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

TBF, "Leave it up to the states" in the context of recreational use is appropriate here. Extending that concept would necessarily include having extremely limited federal regulation, if any at all.

Medical use, in my opinion, should be federally protected, such that you can acquire medical use cannabis for a uniform set of medical purposes in all states.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

100% disagree. First because it puts people in prison for spurious reasons and secondly because it's a plant. You can literally just grow it in your back yard. And it will grow really easily. It doesn't even take work.

You know what will totally fuck you up but is totally legal to own and grow and use? Salvia divinorum. You know what else? San Pedro cactus.

Even with shrooms, it's legal to own the spores when you're talking about psilocybin and Amanita Muscaria is 100% legal. It can literally kill you.

We don't even need to go into tobacco.

How does any of that make sense?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You know what will totally fuck you up but is totally legal to own and grow and use? Salvia divinorum.

Salvia is fucking wild. I do not recommend it unless you want to lose your mind for ~10 minutes or so. Like, from sober to "holy shit I'm on the wheel of fortune right now" in an instant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I only did it once. Apart from tasting absolutely horrible, the trip wasn't even fun. I was laying on the ground and suddenly I was standing upright and was a cowboy leaning against the porch post of a ranch house. And then I was me again. What was the point?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To become a cowboy, very momentarily, pardner

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But I didn't want to be a cowboy. :(

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Space cowboy? Spaced out cowboy?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well... Some people call me the Space Cowboy...

Then again, some call me the gangster of love.

Some people call me Maurice and that's weird because it's just not my name.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

I mean I would appreciate it if it were federally legal. I live in a state where its legal but I'm employed by the federal government so I can't use it without putting my job at risk.

load more comments
view more: next ›