this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
90 points (93.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9817 readers
96 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

You're walking home late at night from the bar because you've had 11 shots of tequila but you still made the conscious decision not to drive for the safety of others. You're crossing a stroad. Someone "in a hurry" decide to run the red light and hits you at 70 km/h (because of course they were speeding, why wouldn't they?), doesn't see you because you're hunched over while you're walking and it's really dark and the person is driving a giant SUV with shit visibility.

Cars are one of the largest source of fatal pedestrian accidents in a major city. How much more likely are you to get into an accident if you're drunk and is less able to pay attention to cars breaking the rules and putting you in danger? Walking safely in most cities is a task you need to be sober for because you have to walk super defensively.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Never leave the house ๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

95% of all fatal drunk-driving accidents happen in the bathroom, or something...

[โ€“] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Technically it's dangerous to get drunk at all, alcohol is a carcinogen (sure is fun though). Of course being sober doesn't protect you from cars either so ยฏ\โ _โ (โ ใƒ„โ )โ _โ /โ ยฏ

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

I lost a good friend in highschool this way.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

That's why I drink alone in the basement.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think drunk drivers make it unsafe for every pedestrian regardless of their soberity. I see kids, adults, and seniors all crossing a busy intersections in a relatively small town every morning. Nearly every day i see a near miss fron a driver turning right on red and nearly hitting a very visibile pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk while they have the right to cross. And most of these drivers arent even drunk or impaired, many of them are texting though.

Most often, the driver is looking up the road to ensure the traffic lanes are clear but many forget to also ensure the crosswalk is clear. What really bothers me is when most drivers almost hit someone, including seniors or children, they honk and throw their hands up as if that pedestrian is the asshole. At least the honk might give someone just enough time to avoid being hit.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

70 km/h sounds like a lot, is it a lot?

[โ€“] Dhs92 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Just looked it up and that's about 11 smoots / second! That is pretty fast!

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

it's the speed of one fart

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

If you're crossing a road and someone runs a red light, I don't think your sobriety is relevant.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Walking drunk is safer than taking a cab unless the cab is electric. When you walk drunk, you risk your own life and maybe one other person. When you take a fossil cab, you risk everyone's lives forever.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

... Who's lives are equally at risk anyway because of some eejit in a factory pumping loads of carbon into the air

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

No, not equally. One more molecule of CO2 increases the risk. If you're going to use that logic, then I might as well drunk drive everywhere because there's already cars on the road and therefore potential for an accident. It's poison logic.