Isn't this a 30 day vulnerability since this vulnerability has been known for a whole month?
I hate the buzzword 0-day.
this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)
Cybersecurity
5392 readers
31 users here now
c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.
THE RULES
Instance Rules
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Community Rules
- Idk, keep it semi-professional?
- Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
- Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.
If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.
Learn about hacking
Other security-related communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Notable mention to [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
If I understand correctly, it was exploited in the wild before a fix was available, which does make it a zero-day. However, the fix has been available for weeks, so while it was technically a zero-day, at this point it's just a vulnerability in unpatched systems.
It's not a buzz word. It's the correct term.
It's when you are given 0 days notice because it's already being exploited when you find out about it.