this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1221 readers
1 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Why swap lenses when you can just swap the glass elements?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CameronDev 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Kinda sounds like they have just made their own proprietary lens mount? I'm not a good enough photographer to know if this is a good system or not.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

I think you'd be right to insert the xkcd meme about another new standard

[–] randombullet 8 points 3 months ago

Seems like a proprietary lens mount.

No way to weather seal. No dust ingress protection.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Amateur photographer here. For those wondering, this is aimed at a very strange segment. It's cheap so it seems to go for beginners who want to have different prime (non zooming) options but don't want the expense. It's also lighter.

The problems:

  • more serious photographers will want better optics and I don't think this brand is it
  • Sharing optics adds complexity to gear in terms of dust/moisture ingress *Cheap prime lenses are not that expensive. This will cost more *You're better off with a higher quality zoom lens that covers the range of this system
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

since when is the lense not the glass part?