this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
186 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54500 readers
913 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 151 points 3 months ago (4 children)

I'm so disgusted. This is just wrong, no matter how you try to justify it.

Because how are people supposed to enjoy the movie in that horrible CAM quality? At least wait for the WEB-DL.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 months ago

TeleSync actually, marginally better.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

I've seen the cam release and it is the best cam I've ever seen..I had been away from the high seas for a decade so I was impressed when I downloaded this movie for my daughter.. Who had gone to the movies to watch it but wanted to watch again

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

I got instantly angry halftrough your comment, then I continued reading…

Reading comments is like climbing a hill. Some of them are montains.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

WILL SOMEBODY PLEASEEEE THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN !! THE CHILDREEEEEN

also I thought deadpool movie was pretty tolerable maybe this ones good too even cheaper cameras and cellphones are pretty good these days

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago

I mean, given the lack of theatres in the country, and the fact the movie won't be released outside of theatres for a while, this is really just a famous case of piracy being an availability issue.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago

With all likelihood; it would have been 3 to 5 whole years before anyone could have purchased a localized, legitimate copy of the movie in Lat.Am.

So no; I do not blame them for doing this. Considering that this movie was even broadcast as a "Public Screening" and likely nobody paid anything in admission but for food and drink...I'd even argue this was a 100% non-commercial use. Depending on the laws in Brazil it might even be "fair use" for a city official to do this; as informational and educational arguments can be made for it depending on the audience.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Read again: it was in Brazil.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Still based

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And they're automatically chad because of it?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

No, Brazil(ian) probably. Not Chad(ian).

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

This made me laugh. Anyone who has lived in central or south america sees this type of thing happen all the time.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Brazilian here, ask me (almost) anything related to this subject.

(no refunds or quality responses garanteed)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

😳a CAM Release?!

Ah no, it is TS, (what does this low quali thing mean? I only know webDL and above)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Ah, it is in consent with the cinema and thus audio is directly switched from the audio out channel and the cam used is way bigger and not Handhold, apparently.