this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1221 readers
1 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Nightmare fuel? Maybe – but in a historic moment for the dental profession, an AI-controlled autonomous robot has performed an entire procedure on a human patient for the first time, about eight times faster than a human dentist could do it.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

OHHH NO. NOPE NOPE NOPE. FUCK OFF.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

So, they finally found a way to make the robot talk to you the whole time and then scold you for talking during the procedure.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I'm thinking of the eyeball scene from dead space.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Novacaine doesn't do a very good job of numbing me, especially as I've gotten older. Would a robot know to put more on once I start screaming?

Also I hate novacaine, feels bad, then I'm nauseous after.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you really think no humans oversee the procedure

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah that makes sense, I commented that after being awoken very early by cat pee on my bed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Asimov's laws of robotics only work when the robot knows what "harm" is. The shitty LLMs today we call "AI" are nowhere close to be trusted with an answer to "is it safe to eat this mushroom?" let alone with putting a 200000 RPM drill in their hands then let them operate on a human. It's utterly irresponsible to give dangerous jobs to robots this soon in their development. But hey, quick profits in a PR bubble.

Later edit: All of you are right. In retrospective, my comment was stupid and doesn't make sense in the context. The robot in question isn't based on LLM (of course it isn't) and isn't general AI either, so the issue of "don't do harm" doesn't apply.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm fairly certain the machine isn't controlled by LLMs. What would make you think that?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I'm now questioning if it is. It shouldn't be but we've scene some silly tech blunders.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I mean robots fly our planes, drive our cars and run critical health devices to keep folk alive and sooooo much more that I am probably not aware of...it already happened the time to raise the alarm was a couple decades ago

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I get that it's positive to serve multiple patients in the same time, but I don't care so much about the time, as that it's done properly.

Also obligatory: "beep boop, done with filling, proceeding with brain lobotomy"

I wonder how they get the correct data for the robot to work with. It would require AI checking xrays I suppose. That seams to be quite a bit away still. But testing will show if it's better than a human dentist. Maybe it could use smaller instruments and cut away less healthy tooth, etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The system, built by Boston company Perceptive, uses a hand-held 3D volumetric scanner, which builds a detailed 3D model of the mouth, including the teeth, gums and even nerves under the tooth surface, using optical coherence tomography, or OCT...This cuts harmful X-Ray radiation out of the process, as OCT uses nothing more than light beams to build its volumetric models, which come out at high resolution, with cavities automatically detected at an accuracy rate around 90%.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Sounds amazing. Thanks

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

At this point, the (human) dentist and patient can discuss what needs doing – but once those decisions are made, the robotic dental surgeon takes over. It plans out the operation, then jolly well goes ahead and does it.>

Whether you change your mind or not!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Dentist golfers in the US rejoiced at the news.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I prefer robotic procedures for things where I am under anesthesia, but for awake procedures I think im going to lean more human.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago