this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
71 points (98.6% liked)

TabletopRPGs

215 readers
1 users here now

The new home of all things TTRPG! Share your stories, recommendations, reviews, questions, resources and more with like minded people.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ultimately good news, but they're still going to make the expansions proprietary. In any case, after playing a fully open source game like Pathfinder, I really can't go back to buying into the D&D model.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

While I'm with you, I don't think it's quite accurate to describe Pathfinder as "fully open source".

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All of the game content is available for free. The only things they limit are some of the flavour text in the splatbooks and of course the adventure paths. All of the mechanical content is fully open. I think that's a pretty good system.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't disagree that it's a good system. I run Pathfinder. I didn't contest that it was a good system.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I didn't suggest that's what you were saying. I'm saying the content is fully open.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The base content is free, the entirety of PF1/2 is not "fully" open.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, the expansion content is free as well as the base. Every time a new PF2e content expansion book comes out, the entirety of the game mechanics in that book is freely available for anyone to use and redistribute. The only things for which that's not the case are the adventure modules.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't believe "fully" means what you think it means. If you loan me $100 to be fully repaid, I'm good just giving you $30 back, right? Cool cool. Send it right over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

IMO adventure modules aren't a part of the game system. The game system is completely open. The adventures are extra. But even the mechanical content introduced in those adventures like unique items and monsters are made open.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I mean, no, not all the content is fully open.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

I realise this is a big step forward for them, but it's also the bare minimum they can do to match the standard set by other publishers in the dungeon fantasy space.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I'm not a fan of their new "editionless" model. Eventually it'll mutate to the point that backwards compatibility will break down and it'll just be a new edition with extra steps.