"Infidelity", "Faithfulness": Are you ok, die-hard-monogamy?
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
44 points (87.9% liked)
Science
3146 readers
9 users here now
General discussions about "science" itself
Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by:
hot
top
controversial
new
old
The funniest part is that researchers still can't figure out how to disengage from generations old bias of what constitutes a simple relationship.
It's rather a wrong use of the words they feature.
Presented questions like "During the time you and [partner’s initials] have/had a sexual relationship, have/did you ever have any other sexual partners?” are not about that, and are indeed heavily limited to monogamy perspective.
You can be in a polygamous relationship, but, unless you previously agreed to have free sexual contacts outside your group, doing so with someone else without everyone's notice and agreement is still absolutely cheating.
Having sex with several partners in a predetermined arrangement is obviously not cheating.
You can have intimacy and passion without sex. Pretty sure the vast majority of infidelity is dead bedroom/lack of sex, because, you know... thats the point of being unfaithful... To get sex with someone else cause you dont get any in your relationship...
This study is shit, intimacy and passion cannot be measured, while sex can, they only had to ask one question about sex frequency in the couple...
"Intimacy" is used as a euphemism for sex, bruh.
Passion and intimacy were not associated with infidelity. This suggests that the quality and frequency of sex or emotional closeness alone do not necessarily deter infidelity.