I swear to god the people arguing against the fediverse are fake, their arguments are so unimaginably bad that I can't imagine they aren't coming from a disinformation campaign
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2023
130 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37712 readers
155 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
coming from a disinformation campaign
It wouldn't be surprising:
Even the user names are formatted in a similar fashion.
That's reddit's auto-generated username format. Most bots use those.
Oh my gosh, someone needs to contact tech news orgs
Like Ars Technica?
Looks exactly like all the arguments against net neutrality when that fiasco went down.
The ELI5 thread yesterday where someone was asking about what was happening looked very similar to this. Nearly everyone in that thread was saying the reddit app was great and people woild be back after the protest. The upvotes just seemed fake to me, is all. One upvoted comment even said the apollo dev was lying, which confused me. Was that spez? Who knows.
That essentially how I see the internet lately on mainstream platforms... You see a lot of posters are basically putting out the most toxic crap imaginable that you essentially learns not to look at comments in certain communities particularly the News website. From all of that experiences, you can see how "Dead Internet Theory" have a lot of merit especially now that "shadowbanning" is common.
"its soooo hard, i can't understand it"
but you use email fine?
its mainly UX, there are some legit bugs, how quick can we fix them?
Feels kind of like learning about some unpaid traffic tickets that OJ Simpson has. Shitty thing to do, but it’s not the main reason I hate the guy.
Fake it till you break it
They are breaking it alright.
They need to break it more
I know what to do here now /s
I mean ya, that's not super surprising. The hardest part of getting a site to take off is adoption.
Exactly. I'm trying to spam content here so people think it's more active. I don't really see a problem with Reddit launching with self generated content, the important thing is the user experience once it gets going.
i wonder if all this big social platform will not end with lots of fake profile feeded with chatgpt. For your information, I'm NOT a chatgpt comment 😜
wow the LLMs can use emojis now
mmm... that's exactly what chatGPT would say...
That's also how they established the norms of the site. The founders wanted a particular kind of community so they made fake accounts post and vote in ways that reflected that desire. Posts with grammatically sound English were upvoted, text speak was downvoted.
Now its just getting sad, lol.
oh that's just what I did for Lemmy, and it worked!
That wont fix activity though
view more: next ›