this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
73 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7164 readers
261 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Visitors are asked to respect posted speed limits and no-stopping zones at all times, as well as stay alert and prepared to encounter wildlife at any time, even when driving along fenced sections of the highway. By reducing speeds, driving alertly, and giving wildlife space and respect, you can help reduce wildlife mortality."

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Bring back trains now

Divest from construction of car infrastructure

Make it safer for wildlife to cross the roads

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Look, I'm all for more trains, but a bear isn't going to fare any better against a train. Especially if you compare braking distances

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But one train is easier to dodge than a bunch of unique cars and drivers. Also trains have a whistle they can blow whenever they're in high wildlife corridors.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Build wildlife corridors like Banff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've seen how badly deer can wreck cars, I'd hate the see what a bear does. Probably better than moose, those things are too cars what a can opener is to a Campbell's soup.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

That is frankly gross that you care more about objects than living breathing sentient beings.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

I mean, my first thought was basically verbatim what the comment you're responding to said. But I was thinking about whether the collision would have killed the passengers of the car, not just "is the car okay?"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

To be fair I don't think him bringing this questioning means he doesn't care about the living. It's sad for the animals and the injured humans, but what is the kind of impact?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

It’s sad for the animals and the injured humans,

Dead humans. If you're talking about moose, at least part of the time the result is dead humansβ€”an elementary school classmate of mine (in northern Ontario) lost an uncle that way. Serious damage to cars often means serious damage to occupants.

Collisions with the local bears tended to be worse for the bears than the humans, because bears are lighter and lower to the ground then moose. They were also much rarer, because bears are less likely to stand in the middle of a narrow highway with a 90km/h speed limit and just chill.