this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
175 points (77.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35393 readers
8 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

To me, it seems objectively easier to pull into a parking space forward and then back out of the space when you are ready to leave. You don't have to line up with the lines while driving backwards, and it's easier to keep from hitting other cars as well. So why back in? To me, the only advantage I can think of is that you can get out quicker, technically.

Edit: I do not need driving instruction, just wondered why. The reasoning.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lots of people with sound, logical explanations of why it's better and easier but nobody talking about, with the common angled parking lots these days, how you then end up pulling out the opposite direction of everyone else and going the wrong way down a one way lane or doing a u-turn and basically fucking everything up for anyone else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, those are lots in which I wouldn't back in. Aside from the points you made, angled parking lots eliminate the drawbacks of pulling in. There's better rear visibility towards one-way traffic, and the angle makes the alignment issue disappear.

I'm assuming all the arguments in favor of backing into parking spots are geared towards parking spots perpendicular to traffic.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah I'm sure there are plenty of people who have the sense to think it through like you did, it's just that I encounter the other type a couple times a week and felt like bitching about it.

Back-in-only spaces with the arrows pointed accordingly is sounding more and more like a superior solution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

coin flip pretty much

I prefer parking for a quicker exit, but if the particular parking spot is too narrow or there's a lot of traffic in the lot I'll just park normal no big deal

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Practical reasons aside (visibility and ease of pulling out) I simply prefer it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Practical reasons aside (visibility and ease of pulling out) I simply prefer it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

One has to back up, either when leaving or arriving - some choose to get it out of the way when they park, others when they leave -

To each their own - I like to back in parking & easy quick exit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Used to work at UPS. It's a weird culture thing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is this purely "backing in" or does nose out qualify? I have gotten in the habit of parking away from the doors wherever I go. As a result the back of the lot is usually empty, allowing me to pull through a spot to be nose out in the next. I do this because it's so much easier to be perfectly set in the parking space. You can usually see in your rear view the lines of the space behind and perfect depth with the back up camera.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Because my HOA doesn't allow it so I do it anyway as a fuck you to them.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›