this post was submitted on 15 May 2024

114 points (99.1% liked)

Canada

7185 readers

264 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

🏒 Sports

Hockey

Football (NFL)

List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

List of All Teams: unknown
Toronto Blue Jays

Basketball

List of All Teams: unknown
Toronto Raptors

Soccer

List of All Teams: unknown
General Community: /c/CanadaSoccer
Toronto FC

💻 Universities

UBC
UWaterloo
SFU
UoGuelph
OTU
McGill
U Western
UofT
UofA: unknown

💵 Finance / Shopping

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social and Culture

Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

114

Alberta claims renewables pause wasn’t political. Emails, texts say otherwise | The Narwhal (thenarwhal.ca)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago

The double standards about where fossil fuels and renewables affect pristine lands is too obvious to see.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Were governed by a libertarian nutbag and her cabinet of cronies... This isn't surprising in the slightest

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You are governed by trump in a dress and you chose this. How kenney was not a warning is beyond belief.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

you chose this

It was something like 2% of the population that actually voted for her.. Just dumbass election laws made it easy for them to put in a fascist

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

*Fascist nutbag

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The original thesis is moot anyway. Anything politicians decide is political by nature...? How would it not be?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Anything anyone decides is political in nature

Politics is people

Kids choosing to be friends with the rich kid instead of the one wearing a cape is politics

[+] [email protected] -18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If you don’t know why ‘email’ doesn’t get an S on the end, then I think we’ve lost the illusion of authority.

Plenty of people seem to weigh in on either side.

This linguistic argument is hardly a settled thing, and definitely not on par with their/there/they're mistakes.

Our Government Weighs in, in favour of emails

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

Huh, I never thought about this. The plurality norms don't quite match snail mail.

"The mail is here" (this sounds normal)
"The mails are here" (this sounds unusual)
"I got an email" (this sounds normal)
"I got a letter" (this sounds normal)
"I got a mail" (this sounds unusual)

I guess this comes down to the fact that there is no widely-used word for a single piece of electronic mail. Perhaps "eletter" would be the analogue, but I've never seen it used. As a result, "email" is used for both a single piece, and the category as a whole.