this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
453 points (97.3% liked)

News

23014 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 142 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"protests don't do anything"

"the protests are violent and racist"

Yada Yada yada

[–] [email protected] 62 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Yup. Protests are clearly effective. One thing about the point of violence- if you’re at a protest and you hear threats or see violence, speak up or leave. With the new ruling by SCOTUS, one bad actor can have the entire protest charged with criminal behavior. Stay safe. Protect yourselves and one another.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 6 months ago (1 children)

which is why they are more prone than ever at being infiltrated by provocateurs

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

True. Although it doesn’t matter if it’s a provocateur or an actual racist, they’ll get you arrested just the same.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Except all the nazi demonstrations get police escorts to/from the site and maybe a slap on the wrist if they hurt or kill someone.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago

Because the police protect their own.

Its why every time the nazis/fascists/racists march, the cops always have their backs to them watching the crowds.. yet when people like the college students march, they stand facing them, salivating for an excuse.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

With the new bullshit ruling by SCOTUS

FTFY

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I thought this was only in a few states (5th circuit) and the SCOTUS refused to hear the case?

Still bullshit don't get me wrong

Just trying to set the record straight

[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Cost of Attendance, Undergraduate, Brown University: Full Time Off-Campus. $71,412

Yet, they have billions in investment funds.

I'm 110% in favor of higher education, but not at schools that are run like an exploitation racket. Even state schools, that receive loads of Federal funding, are exploiting students financially. It's insane that it has gotten this bad. Soon, the upper class will be the only ones who will be able to afford an education. In light of everything else, that almost feels intentional.

Apologies for the slight digression here, but institutes of higher education that are overflowing with cash make me see red. You're a school, that's not how any of this is supposed to work.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

It is intentional. An educated populace knows when they're getting fucked by the upper class. An uneducated populace believe when they're told giving more money to the rich generates jobs or pleases god.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Brown also owns a large portion of the nicer parts of providence. They’ve been around since the 1700s so that’s how they got so much property and money in the first place. I agree with almost everything you said except the fact that it’s an Ivy League and they’re specifically meant to be prohibitively expensive so you have to be rich or brilliant enough to get a scholarship there. My girlfriend got a full scholarship for Harvard from her government and it is not easy for anyone who doesn’t have money, even with a full scholarship.

If we were talking about the state schools charging close to as much as Harvard and Brown, then I’d fully agree with you.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 6 months ago

Definitely a victory for the protestors. I'm a bit disappointed that they're agreeing to hear arguments and vote on the issue in October, rather than committing to anything or taking any action in the next 6 months. Still, props to the school for listening to the students.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago

That's encouraging. Just when I thought nothing would come of the protests. Now to see if the vote actually pass a motion to divest.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

wow, a major institution with a back bone. dont see that much now-a-days.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No backbone, they just got caught red-handed and even now are trying to weasel out by setting the voting date 6 months from now. They're hoping the media attention would have died out by then.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Does selling their stock really do anything? All the big investment firms will still buy these up for their mutual funds. Unless everyone agrees not to buy their stock, I don’t see how this helps. And even then, their stock would be so cheap they could just buy it back themselves and go private right?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 6 months ago

Does selling their stock really do anything? All the big investment firms will still buy these up for their mutual funds. Unless everyone agrees not to buy their stock, I don’t see how this helps. And even then, their stock would be so cheap they could just buy it back themselves and go private right?

Its what forced South Africa to break up their apartheid state. Yeah, it really actually works and its one of the only things that has historically been demonstrated to work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Green is the only thing capitalists see and will respond to. Good number going down is the only truly bad thing in their world.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago

I thought the whole reason universities had their hands tied were the anti-BDS law. Maybe Brown is in a state (RI) where it won't lose state funding, but losing federal funding would be a blow to the research orgs.