this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
389 points (97.6% liked)

News

23014 readers
7 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Last year, New Orleans added more than 1,000 child care seats for low-income families after voters approved a historic property tax increasein 2022. The referendum raised the budget of the program seven-fold — from $3 million to $21 million a year for 20 years. Because Louisiana’s early childhood fund matches money raised locally for child care, the city gets an additional $21 million to help families find care.

New Orleans is part of a growing trend of communities passing ballot measures to expand access to child care. In Whatcom County, Washington, a property tax increase added $10 million for child care and children’s mental health to the county’s annual budget. A marijuana sales tax approved last year by voters in Anchorage, Alaska, will generate more than $5 million for early childhood programs.

The state of Texas has taken a somewhat different tack. In November, voters approved a state constitutional amendment that allows tax relief for qualifying child care providers. Under this provision, cities and counties can choose to exempt a child care center from paying all or some of its property taxes. Dallas was among the first city-and-county combo in Texas to provide the tax break.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 92 points 6 months ago (7 children)

Cue the people saying, "why should I have to pay this tax when I don't have children?"

And not just Republicans either.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"It gives the parents an opportunity to have kids in a society that otherwise puts emphasis on employment first, and family second.. and we'll need some of those kids to take care of you and wipe yo' ass at the retirement home when you'll be older."

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago

Why should my Tax Dollars go to OTHER PEOPLE'S KIDS when there's perfectly fine BILLIONAIRES who can use it to buy a new Yacht instead?

-Republicans trying to Save The Children!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

And then complaining that Americans (only certain ones of course) are not having enough children.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Better nose pickers than death squads I suppose

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Same people who complain of high property taxes but consistently vote "No" when the request for multifamily housing is proposed

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

And how much money is going to the educators to support them? Or will it all funnel into the owners pockets at tax payer expenses?

Educators receive some of the lowest median wages of all industries and are struggling to hire workers due to shortages because it is an unsustainable and grueling profit driven industry when for-profit centres are involved. Many educators already have to supply their own resources, they can’t afford more children enrolled.

And if you want high quality education and care for these children, you need to retain staff who have institutional and professional knowledge.


  • Full-time teachers are paid $14 per hour on average, and real wages have actually dropped by 6.5 percent during the seven years since the first survey was conducted.

https://www.americanprogress.org/article/still-underpaid-and-unequal/

The report revealed that while 12.3 million children required childcare services in 2022, only 8.7 million slots were available in licensed childcare centers, resulting in a notablegap of 3.6 million spots.1

ECE experts are noticing a decrease in the number of high-quality child care workers, which has only been made worse since the pandemic compelling numerous competent caregivers to leave the profession, citing health concerns, insufficient support and inadequate compensation.

https://www.rasmussen.edu/degrees/education/blog/americas-escalating-childcare-crisis-and-its-impact-on-early-childhood-educators/

Why You Can’t Find Child Care: 100,000 Workers Are Missing

Where did they go? To better-paying jobs stocking shelves, cleaning offices or doing anything that pays more than $15 an hour.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/13/us/child-care-worker-shortage.html

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The learning centers are nuts. The one my son went to started at $2600/month three years ago. It's more now, of course. Each teacher was responsible for up to four infants. Over $10k per month per teacher. Guess how much they made? The senior teacher made $25/hr and the junior one made $20/hr (barely above minimum). So $3900/month went to the infant teachers. One year olds got a cost break down to $2400/month and each teacher could watch five. There is no reason for a teacher to go there instead of just doing nannying where two kids would make them $35-40/hr.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Insurance, licensing, physical building and maintenance, FICA, health insurance, PTO, additional coverage for workers who are constantly sick from kids being sick, administrative assistant, building security, accounting, attorneys, and so on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I understand that labor costs are not the only costs. But over $10k per teacher is the low end and also numbers from three years ago. When we left a year ago, his tuition was $2300 after a 10% discount from my work. That was a classroom with 6 kids per teacher so likely over $14k revenue per teacher per month who still averages $3600/month. They did not do a great job with extra teachers since I recall him having to stay home a dozen times because of a lack of teachers. They were not even close to the most expensive. Bright Horizons charged about $3200 per infant three years ago. They definitely make healthy profit while paying their teachers very little in a high cost of living city.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I agree with you about educators, but educators are not involved in this case because it's child care and not school. And while child care workers definitely need to be paid more as well, this is a good thing for a lot of poor people and don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Professionals working in Early Childhood Education, that is 0-5 years, are called educators.

We teach children, that is our job. We are not simply minders while you work. We hold university degrees for teaching, we follow (where applicable) state regulations, we plan curriculum, and buy resources to teach with.

Children learn more in the first few years of life than they ever will at any other point. ECE is critical.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Okay, my apologies for not knowing the term. I would still say not to let the perfect be the enemy of the good. You do deserve to be paid more, but that doesn't mean this is a bad thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This isn’t even good, there’s already a huge demand for a spot in a centre that cannot be met due to staff shortages, all this does is add to the number of children trying to be enrolled.

If you want to see more children attending, you need to get more educators, to get more educators you need to focus on their wages and working conditions.

Programs like this while potentially great for handful of low income families fuck over us low income workers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

apples and oranges dude. this article is about child care, not education. youre not wrong about education also taking a back seat, but this is an article about the critical nature of child care and a mild success in its implementation, not the also critically important child education.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Childcare is the colloquialism for Early Childhood Education.

So no, not apples and oranges, it’s bananas and nanas.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

ahh i see, youre not capable of separating them despite our society being setup in very distinct compensatory categories. got it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I work in the industry, we are educators.

And if you think teachers in schools are getting compensated well you’re also mistaken.

You don’t know what you’re on about, got it.

[–] stembolts 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I apologized for not knowing the correct terminology. What more do you want me to do?

[–] stembolts 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

No worries, I understand the anger.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Having children doesn't make sense in a capitalist society, because children cost money without producing anything. Parents have to compete with non-parents for housing, employment, energy, and transportation, while having less to bid on these items because they are paying to raise children. Extinction is inevitable because the future, neither the environment nor its inhabitants, have value in the marketplace.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

It’s almost like people are illogical, emotional beings, and don’t think purely in terms of the most profitable course

But yeah, clearly this isn’t enough anymore and we as a society need to start making parenthood more appealing. It seems so obvious this is yet another long term disaster in the making that could be prevented with minor changes now, but we’ll blunder into it in half a century and surprise pikachu face when the impact is huge

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I'd argue we're already seeing the effects with lower birthrates in recent years.