Communism

Jesus fucking christ. It's the "Am I allowed to participate in society?" all over again. No, it's not some huge hypocricy to have an extra flat that you rent out, or to work a high salary job. It's also not a crime to want some comforts and even luxuries.

The landlords in pre-revolution China were essentially feudal lords, not people with a bit of extra wealth that still laboured for their living. There's no point in looking down on people over what is little more than pittance for an actual capitalist today, those arseholes take trips to the bottom of the ocean for the money your parents accrued over their lifetime.

I feel I would've been a lot softer if I hadn't read the comments. I also struggled with this when I was younger. If you truly can't fathom being petit bourgeois, just sell it when you inherit it, though be wary that the buyer may be another leech looking for investments. Otherwise I'd say it's sufficient that you keep in mind that as a human being your interests lie with the preletariat. It might be even better if you used your money to support revolutionary activity.

Castro’s family owned a plantation but he expropriated his own parents during the revolution to give their land to peasants. His sister went to Miami and joined the CIA.

Che was born to an upper class family, so, no it’s not hypocritical for you to be in your situation being a Marxist Leninist.

Is it hypocritical for me to be a Marxist-Leninist when my parents are landlords?

Definitely not.

First off, you have no choice on what your parents do, that's outside of your control. But even after that, divesting yourself of your class voluntarily is what liberals love advocating for, but has very little actual impact. If you look at many prominent socialists throughout time, you'll see that they had the time, resources and privilege to advance the cause in large part because of a good material condition. Neither Marx, Engels nor Lenin would have had so much time to dedicate to developing socialism if they were labourers or lumpenproletarians. All that is asked is that when the time comes, you'll fight so that landlords cease to exist as a class, rather than resist change for some attachment to your privilege.

My recommendation is instead for you to look into ways of making your "landlord-ism" the least exploitative you can. In the grand scheme of things, a single apartment of 4 is not gonna change society and still leaves you far away from the higher capitalist class, no matter what they tell you. And on the other hand, using that privilege to further the cause, educate yourself and fight the good fight can do a lot of good. You'll probably have to figure out how to balance these ideas on your own, but beating yourself over it without a plan won't do you any good.

You are not personally guilty for the sins of your parents. In fact, that you recognize your privileged status and wish to fix the contradiction is commendable.

Welp. Better pick a wall.

Jk. Tons of famous communists were class traitors.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_traitor

Additionally, Friedrich Engels, partner and lifelong friend of Karl Marx, the revolutionary socialist, was himself a son of a wealthy factory owner. Such people sacrifice their ability to be part of the capitalist upper-class for the sake of who they see as the oppressed, even if it hurts their status in the process.

I think it's less about your specific status than about the ideas and the people your stand with.

I agree that others are saying you are not a hypocrite. YOU don’t control your parents’ means of earning income, you control the way that you make money, and depending on the work opportunity or laws in your area, sometimes that isn’t even the case.

I call them land parasites. The word lord pisses me off, and its more accurate to what they do.

I would say you are an exception because usually people with enough wealth to own multiple properties aren't the ones that care about the working people.

My parents rent out an extended mobiles home on our property. My grandmother lived there and we took care of here for year and when she passed the property came back to us. If we just kept it as a second building our taxes would go up significantly. If we rented it out it wouldn't cost us any additional taxes. I realized this is how they prevent you from forming communes by attacking you with additional taxes for sharing property instead of renting it out like a fucking landlord. They do it just to not have to deal with extra taxes. Charge super low rent for it.

No you're not inherently hypocritical because while you may be the beneficiary of capitalist exploitation and landleeches, but that doesn't mean you must do the same. Not unlike what Engles did, there are pro worker movements that you could put your efforts toward especially if you're in a more comfortable and need to work relatively less.. After all it's hard to teach theory and spread awareness/organize labour power, if you're always having to work for the meat on your plate. We're not a movement of meritocracy/individuality, we need as many people to understand and teach the horrors of capitalism as well the way forward.

That all said ensure you get your education and don't waste this opportunity to ensure your own financial security (ideally with no reliance on labour value extraction). To become a capitalist is "bad" but there always will be capitalists so to be a capitalists that is pushing for revolution will be better than anti-revolutionaries exclusive holding the power. Additionally, many great members of the movement have benefited from or been themselves capitalists. Their self-awareness and efforts they made to write these wrongs is what set them apart.

TLDR; Not inherently hypocritical. You're benefiting from workers being squeezed, don't let them be sucked dry just so you can lick the cheeto dust off your fingers or else yeah that'd be pretty sour. You sound like you're already on the right track by even asking this question. Good luck comrade.

I was browsing the boards up and down before reading this, and my first reaction was "haven't you read who Engels was and what he did for a living?", but others had the same response as well.

The reason I was searching and browsing threads was to locate reading material about "private property" and the distinction of it being owenrship of means of production or property you couldn't exploit anyone's labor with.

I am firm and clear about production means not being private, but what if someone creates/builds something for their own use. It can be a cabin,house, or it can be a raw boat, a violin, a bicycle... without any intention of renting them, using them to exploit others. What can be wrong with it? I am thinking more about the amount of resources needed, that they would have to become private to be used, so building a 6 story 1000 sq.m building "for yourself" is an overkill and abuse of resources, but even painting on a piece of canvas also needs privatization of "materials". So there has to be a cut-off.

But banning all private property makes no sense at all, it is nearly inhumane to enforce such policy.

You don't need to inherit the opinion or practices of your parents.

That'd be monarchy or smth xD

well...there's no need to feel confused because "we're still in this capitalistic shit and we need to survive". but it would be good to ask yourself: if communism wins, which side will i choose? and obviously read theory to deflect liberal haters with their questions about "hypocrisy" and thinking about ways to make your material conditions more benefical for your community