this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
300 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

58133 readers
4050 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


On Wednesday, the IEEE Computer Society announced to members that, after April 1, it would no longer accept papers that include a frequently used image of a 1972 Playboy model named Lena Forsén.

An uncropped version of the 512×512-pixel test image originally appeared as the centerfold picture for the December 1972 issue of Playboy Magazine.

In 1997, Playboy helped track down Forsén, who appeared at the 50th Annual Conference of the Society for Imaging Science in Technology, signing autographs for fans.

It is also a sexually suggestive photo of an attractive woman, and its use by men in the computer field has garnered criticism over the decades, especially from female scientists and engineers who felt that the image (especially related to its association with the Playboy brand) objectified women and created an academic climate where they did not feel entirely welcome.

The comp.compression Usenet newsgroup FAQ document claims that in 1988, a Swedish publication asked Forsén if she minded her image being used in computer science, and she was reportedly pleasantly amused.

In a 2019 Wired article, Linda Kinstler wrote that Forsén did not harbor resentment about the image, but she regretted that she wasn't paid better for it originally.


The original article contains 732 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

First learned about that image on this video https://youtu.be/yCdwm2vo09I

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

Are they published by Elsevier? Just tell them it's AI-generated and they'll be happy to publish it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Good. Sick and tired of seeing Lena.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

I mean, since she wants the usage retired, I’m all for it. But even she is proud of the picture, and I’m definitely not sick of seeing it, few times though I have.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

The Lena image is (was?) featured quite prominently in the OpenCV docs and tutorials. Kinda weird it only now goes noticed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

It's been banned from Nature for a while now

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›