this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
424 points (92.1% liked)

Fediverse

17770 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Yay Holocaust denialism /s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago

Cool I hope it works out, more alternatives aren't a bad thing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (8 children)

You are underestimating, by a mile, the editorial effort that goes into fighting scam and spam, vandalism and lies. Wikipedia does have a support structure to do that, I doubt instance admins have the same kind of resources.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Also, any such wiki has to be allow-list only by default. Any open wiki is vandalized with spam and hate speech almost immediately. Open federation would make this trivial.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You've picked a nice name :) I'm glad you didn't choose fedipedia.

I just created an account on open.ibis.wiki and created "Lemmy" article but it's not shown on ibis.wiki 🤔 I guess it still has a long way to go, but I think it's a nice project 👍

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Right ibis.wiki wasnt following open.ibis.wiki. I did that now, made an edit and it got federated as expected.

https://ibis.wiki/article/[email protected]/history

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

I think a centralized view of knowledge that Wikipedia provides is great, plus the record of changes and discussions help capture some of the nuances people are aiming for.

That said where this really accelerates is when bias is wanted. For example the Arch wiki vs Debian wiki vs Wikipedia all SHOULD have biases that cater to their specific audience, even if there is obvious overlap.

Interestingly use of wikidata could help create aknowlledge graph associating parts of the fediwikiverse and we might be able to see a dream of mine ; dynamic knowledge content. Where I might be an expert in databases so I can get the condensed version of how postgres but get the beginners version of kubernetes on an article about deploying them together

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

A great idea. I wonder if the fandom wikis could move onto the platform and therefore make the adoption widespread.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The abuse potential this has feels quite concerning. You've just given kiwifarms a decentralized tool to host its stalking profiles on people.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

Gabe, KiwiFarm started from the forum section of CWC Wiki (in fact, the name KiwiFarms itself is a corruption of "CWC Wiki Forums"), which was hosted on MediaWiki, so "not letting KiwiFarms host their own wiki" is a ship that has long since sailed.

I really fail to see how this has more abuse potential than hosting an independent wiki on MediaWiki, even if the content they host there is... not very nice, to say the least. If anything, there is more control against abuse since they would just be defederated.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›