Not so much a bomb, more of a... what's the opposite of a bomb? A slowly deflating beach ball?
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
25 points (90.3% liked)
Collapse
3240 readers
1 users here now
We have moved to https://lemm.ee/c/collapse -- please adjust your subscriptions
This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.
Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.
RULES
1 - Remember the human
2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source
3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.
4 - No low effort posts.
Related lemmys:
- /c/green
- /c/antreefa
- /c/gardening
- /c/[email protected]
- /c/[email protected]
- c/[email protected]
- /c/biology
- /c/criseciv
- /c/eco
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
A depopulation woopie cussion
There are economical implications to this development. But IMHO population decline is necessary to ease the pressure on the ecosystem. 34% of mammals are humans, 62% is livestock, only 4% are wild animals. We shifted the natural world so far out of balance, that the need to sacrifice economic growth for sustainability is inevitable.
In truth the bomb has already gone off and we're living in its aftermath. Secondary explosions are still going on in various places. Humanity is slowly coming to its senses but isn't fully aware yet of all the damage that's been done.
Problem is that other wildlife is unlikely to survive the bottleneck of human population
I'm not so certain it will unroll slowly. I think there could be a feedback mechanism involved, specifically related to economic organization and its inability to react in a sufficiently timely manner.