this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
211 points (95.7% liked)

News

23014 readers
5 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The head of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives says he fears that a drumbeat of mass shootings and other gun violence across the United States could make Americans numb to the bloodshed, fostering apathy to finding solutions rather than galvanizing communities to act.

Director Steve Dettelbach’s comments to The Associated Press came after he met this past week with family members of some of the 18 people killed in October at a bowling alley and a bar in Lewiston, Maine by a U.S. Army reservist who later took his own life.

He said people must not accept that gun violence is a prevalent part of American life.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 66 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For me, Sandy Hook was the moment I realized we aren't going to collectively do anything about gun violence.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

Seeing children cry whatever. But the amount of grownups I saw cry that day—people who I expected didn’t cry at all even—and I was like “don’t get your hopes up, self; these Americans are sadists to people unlike themselves and they are people who like horrible things”. I was delighted when I was wrong for the first six months. And then despondently correct all along since then. What kind of horrible people made out of literal garbage allow the slaughters and massacres, especially those of children, to continue? Disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They don't become numb. They already are, for quite some time.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When people knee-jerkingly respond to proposals to gun regulations with a subset of {God-given rights, "law-abiding citizens", American exceptionalism, analogy involving apples, founding fathers are always right, gun control doesn't work}, yes, I think you are right

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 8 months ago

Worked with a Gen-X woman when we came into work and heard about the latest mass shooting. Another millennial and I responded fairly flatly: "another one huh?" She expressed some sadness that we were so jaded, that it's just what we grew up with as normal.

Become numb?

Too late man.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago (3 children)

When I visited the Netherlands, there was something I felt that I couldn't really find the words for at the time. It was a lightness, that upon stepping off the train and embarking down the steps to Amsterdam proper, my soul just felt light.

Later on, I'm in a weed cafe when an American couple walk in. The man walks towards the back restroom after making a purchase, leaving his significant other at the counter. She smiles with her whole body, and says loudly, perhaps louder than she realized, "you don't have a gun!" she laughs, "I feel safe!"

And that's what it was. That lightness. When we arrived, unbeknownst to us, the burden of thought that surrounds you in the U.S. where every chance encounter could lead to a violent death, where every supermarket or corner store holds within it the potential for a mass shooting. This ever prevalent threat of gun violence that surrounds us everyday, we get used to it. So used to it, that when we find ourselves somewhere without it, the feeling of peace and safety that accompany this loss is felt in your soul.

But you don't realize it's there until you feel what life can be without it. Tally it up as just another burden we carry, beholden to gun manufacturers. The toll is not just in the loss of life, but also the loss of peace within ourselves and our communities.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago

I live in a Canadian city, and I recall some years back there was an incident where some guy from Texas got in trouble for carrying a handgun while visiting. He raised a huge fuss on social media and went back to the US as soon as he was able, ranting about how he couldn't feel safe in Canada because they wouldn't allow him to have the ability to shoot anyone who might attack him while he was there. I wish I could find one of the news articles, there was a lot of head-shaking amusement from the locals at the time.

Really goes to show how diametrically different people can be sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

We keep trying, but the courts and legislatures are packed with 2A nutters who believe that "a well regulated militia" means there shouldn't be any restrictions on gun ownership.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

To be fair to those legislators, that amendment is fairly clear with its ‘shall not be infringed’ statement. The only way out of that issue is to pass a new amendment invalidating the old one.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Except that's not how it was interpreted until District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008.

Up until then, the right to bear arms was directly connected to the necessity of a well regulated militia. Then the Court reinterpreted it to say that the right is completely unconnected to service in a militia, and now guns are much more difficult to regulate.

Don't fall for the propaganda. The Supreme Court can just make up whatever shit they want. All that matters is who the Justices are.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Those other words must be there by accident.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

No, that's not being fair at all. The amendment in full reads:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

A full half of that single sentence is talking about "a well regulated militia" being the justification for allowing people to keep arms. There have been decades of flim-flammery ignoring that completely and trying to imply that the intent was to say "Militias are good for national security given how we just went through a rebellion that depended on them. Oh, and on a completely unrelated note, everyone should be allowed to carry portable machine guns and concealed hand-cannons the likes of which were never even imagined in our time."

This is a nutty interpretation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well regulated obviously means not regulated at all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I am still confused what militia is supposed to mean.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Hold up. There's an enforcer? The fuk has they been doing all these years?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The head of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

Yeah I think he was focusing his attention on drugs mostly. In some sense at least.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Shooting dogs and making laws without the approval of Congress.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's chilling talking to Americans about gun violence.

They are well past any early desensitization.

And they definitely accept gun violence as a prevalent part of their lives.

Citizens from other countries are truly horrified if you posit the idea if a mass shooting to them, especially involving children.

American responses range from "look, the thing is...bullshit false rationalization they don't understand" to "I know, it's fucking bullshit!" followed by a shake of their head and a shrug of their shoulders.

Those are the extremes. Usually it's just an exasperated sigh.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's because we know our leaders don't give a fuck about the will of the people, and they've stacked the deck so voting really doesn't matter anymore.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not true, that's a lazy conservative talking point.

It isn't "the leaders" and it isn't both sides, conservatives have led a successful concerted effort to shackle the effects and rights of voters for decades precisely because of how important voting was and still is.

You throwing up your hands and falsely implying there's no point in voting is dancing to the tune of those who want voting not to matter.

People voted out trump, for example.

Skin of their teeth, but voting got it done.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's been 25 years since Columbine and I've been voting the whole time. When will it start to work?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (12 children)

You notice trump not being elected president in 2024?

The keystone xl pipeline being canceled.

Transgender ban in the military being reversed, funding for LGBTQ civil rights groups.

Student debt relief in the tens of billions.

Rejoining Paris climate agreement.

Hundreds of thousands of government buildings and vehicles being renovated or replaced to follow sustainable guidelines.

The largest American infrastructure update and development in history.

These changes and many, many more happened in three years because trump was voted out.

Voting matters.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

May? There long since stopped being enough outrage to do anything about it. We’ve been numb to it a long time

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

The US is a failed shithole nation. Another mass shooting? Thoughts and prayers, what's for lunch?

Yes the violence is everywhere, gun violence and just aggressive natural attitudes that make life terrible. To the people that always say "well I don't have that type of crime/gun violence/issue, it's way exaggerated", well you're wrong. You literally have become numb to it because it is everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

I find it as good development. When we stop writing about each shooting in all newspapers, discussing it on TV 24/7, filling internet with it, only then those nutjobs stop considering mass shooting as something that can be done by them too to shock others.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

The ATF wants us to become numb to burning children to death.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

People I once could say I respected became cold way to fast. It is even shown in many other parts of their life. I always hope they can find the way back to who they were. But I feel like it will take a long time. But I will not give up trying to hold my ground on trying to do the right thing. Remember many will become dull to the world but as long as some of us hold on and show them their is a better way. We can keep hope alive.

load more comments
view more: next ›