this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
158 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

4640 readers
1 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (7 children)

I wonder if they find each other attractive looking like that. Brutally honest question, perhaps. I apologize.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What, the wild hair? I dig it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

It's probably a sheep's wool hat

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do people find you attractive looking like that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's kind of my point. I don't think they would, lol.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

I'm just yanking your chain, I'm sure you're plenty handsome/beautiful

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean I hear ya, but most of those folks look pretty old. A lot of cultures have elder traditions that don’t exactly include looking hot. No idea, but given how old the photo is, might be they’re important village elders, or people like priests/spiritual leaders, and they’re wearing ceremonial stuff also.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

You're probably right!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And here I was, zooming in and seeing stunningly beautiful faces before checking comments.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They're beautiful in some sense, but growing up in the society I have, I don't find them "attractive" in that sense, if you know what I mean.

But I assume they must find each other attractive since they exist (someone made them, wink wink). I just think it's cool that it can be so different.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I find that attraction evolves with age, and it becomes easier to see imperfection, differences, and/or signs of age as erotic. There is the eroticism of youth that we all seem to come by naturally, and then there is the eroticism of experience, that is an acquired, but powerful, taste.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Straight facts on god kids.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean attraction is very complex. Beauty standards change through the ages, so while it can be jarring to look at a old photograph, particularly one from a (presumably) very different culture to your own, it’s important to remember the amount of space and time that you are looking through.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

That's what I'm saying, kind of. Like, if the young people looked like this too, it wouldn't have prevented the opposite sex from finding them attractive, since breeding kept happening.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Front row center is a stone cold fox. Just to the left of them - that grin? That's game. And the person just behind and between them has such a kind face, I bet they'd be a generous lover.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago