this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
712 points (90.3% liked)

linuxmemes

20880 readers
8 users here now

I use Arch btw

Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
712
Reality check (programming.dev)
submitted 6 months ago by sus to c/[email protected]
118 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 60 points 6 months ago (3 children)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

We could call it … WebAssembly! And now it’s a C compilation target, which means we can run Node.js in the browser, to get a javascript runtime :)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that the other way around? Developing for the web in assembly is not the same as running assembly on a browser.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It could be the same.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Usually when people are talking about web development in assembly they mean development back end applications.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Does node have wasm support yet? Corporations have been looking for a way to stack performance degradation on the web to an arbitrary degree. The Node running on wasm running on node running on wasm running on node running on wasm running in the browser stack could get so hot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Why does this look so authentic?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Web Development With Assembly

O'NO