Space

8341 readers

471 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.

Rules

Be respectful and inclusive.
No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
Engage in constructive discussions.
Share relevant content.
Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Use appropriate language and tone.
Report violations.
Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula

Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography

Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

217

Astronomers are on the Hunt for Dyson Spheres (www.universetoday.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because all that energy contains heat as well, and you'll need to balance the heat from your star along with the energy absorbed.

You're never going to get to 100% efficient conversion, so you'll have to radiate away the heat so your sphere doesn't melt or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Sure, you won't reach 100%. But say you reach 99.9% - the Dyson sphere should radiate infrared at 0.1% of a normal star, right? It wouldn't necessarily be bright.

[–] DeprecatedCompatV2 1 points 4 months ago

Not all heat can be converted to work by the second law of thermodynamics. Now the question is, how hot can the star be for it to sustain life? Can most of its light be UV with very little visible? https://courses.lumenlearning.com/suny-physics/chapter/15-4-carnots-perfect-heat-engine-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics-restated/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

They must be mining a lot of bitcoin to need 99.9% of a star’s energy.

Or else to power one of those Kurtzgestat space lasers that will melt us anyway.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Even if that level of efficiency were possible, 0.01% of a star's output is still a substantial amount of heat. You would still have to radiate it away otherwise it would melt your mega structure, and you would have to radiate it out equally in all directions otherwise you'd knock it off its orbit with the thrust generated from the radiating of the heat on one side.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah, it’s interesting to think about IR powered thrust.

I wonder if moving a star by cooling one side could ever happen? Like in a some weird future tech way obviously.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Maybe they are just fabricating matter. That takes a surprising amount of energy!