this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
101 points (100.0% liked)
Space
8341 readers
1 users here now
Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
🔭 Science
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They had to accept the null hypothesis. Not a bad thing, the point of science is to determine what's true, not reinforce what you want to be true.
Unfortunately when it comes to paradigm shifts this is not the case
Academia has a huge problem with arrogance and stubbornness
This is just not the case. When Schrodinger proposed the wave equation it did not take long to become commonly accepted. It didn't even take long for Einstein 's theory of relativity to be accepted by the scientific community either, even though the implications of that theory sound completely insane to human intuition.
It took longer for Darwin's theories to be generally accepted, though, and somehow some people still won't acknowledge them.
My impression has been that Dark Matter had long been the preferred explanation over MOND. The remaining MOND advocates aren't quite done yet, but they're getting close.
Still hasn't helped in nailing down what the hell Dark Matter really is.
Inertia
I work/worked in science and I'd say it's humans. Especially old humans who get their egos tied up into their work.
Younger scientists seem to find it easier when they're told a concept that forms at least a portion of their previous work is wrong - many just roll with it. Time to do more research, hooray for enhanced job security.
Older scientists, though, tend to fight that change because even if the disproven concept is only 5% of their work, it's 5% of decades of work and their work has increasingly become part of their identity. That's a big part of the reason I stepped out of both research and lab work: so many snooty, old, white men who lack lives outside of their field of study. They're just exhausting to be around.
old human 😂
... Is a property of matter
Does this mean academia is matter?!
Dense matter.