this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
49 points (96.2% liked)
Daily Maths Challenges
189 readers
1 users here now
Share your cool maths problems.
Complete a challenge:
- Post your solution in comments, if it is exactly the same as OP's solution, let us know.
- Have fun.
Post a challenge:
- Doesn't have to be original, as long as it is not a duplicate.
- Challenges not riddles, if the post is longer than 3 paragraphs, reconsider yourself.
- Optionally include solution in comments, let it be clear this is not a homework help forums.
- Tag [unsolved] if you don't have a solution yet.
- Please include images, if your question includes complex symbols, attach a render of the maths.
Feel free to contribute to a series by DMing the OP, or start your own challenge series.
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
6.5 square units
~~The description doesn't match the image. The image shows two lines that intersect. The description's lines would not intersect as stated. My answer is for the image, not the description.~~
~~The first line's coordinates should be 0,4 to 8,1. The second should be 1,5 to 7,0.~~
I see you corrected it.
Huh. I got 7.5 square units. Now I'm rechecking my calculations frantically. Lol.
I guess there's no rule against posting your work.
I divided it in half down the middle and made a note to double my answer at the end.
The whole half rectangle has an area of 20. The trapezoid below has an area of
(2.5+4)*4/2=13
. The triangle above has an area of3*2.5/2=3.25
.20-13-3.25=3.75
. Multiplying that by 2 (because that 3.75 is only the area of the top left half of the shaded portion) gives 7.5.Edit: Bah! Never mind. Found my mistake.
3*2.5/2=3.75
, not 3.25. With that fix I get 6.5.Posting work is encouraged 🙂
You've got it, it's 6.5. I actually posted this problem because I originally found the answer using trig, which seemed a bit too brute-force-y, especially considering the original source for this problem - I wanted to see if others could/would find the simpler solution that I assumed existed. And you did ^_^
I tried it just using the area of a kite, but ended up with sqrt(2)*sqrt(22.25) and got ~6.67 I made a mistake somewhere I guess.
The issue there is it isn't a kite: The two longer sides don't have equal length - they're sqrt(73)/2 and sqrt(61)/2. So it's a decent approximation but not quite exact.
Oh jeez. Of course. Thanks.
One doesn't really see this if the image is oriented like that. Rotating your phone or your head so that the vertical axis matches the long diagonal of the 'kite' makes this difference more obvious.