Interesting Global News
What is global news?
Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media posts
Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
- [email protected] - International and local legal news.
- [email protected] - Technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
- [email protected] - Interesting articles, projects, and research that doesn't fit the definition of news.
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
view the rest of the comments
Well, there you go. How can you expect people to pay attention when you're telling them there's nothing they can do?
That's not what I'm saying. We are past the point of being able to reverse the harm already done, but we can still limit the future harm. And that is critical. The current world is still livable, alternative is portions of the world becomes unlivable.
And who knows, maybe some future tech will make possible what is impossible today.
Something needs to be done about the greedy oil industry lobbyists who have far too much influence over... well... everything.
For example my spouse and I wanted to replace our oil heater with an electric heat pump + solar panels for our small house. The problem is the electric heat pump/installation is prohibitively expensive. It's far cheaper and more convenient to get a new oil or gas furnace.
We hope to save and get one anyway, but it won't happen for a long time even if we have zero emergencies.
The oil companies are lobbying against subsidies/incentives for new tech like this because it cuts into their profits. It's frustrating that the average person can't make meaningful change because we can't afford to. All thanks to the market being controlled by the oil companies.
Sorry for the rant. This is just one little piece of the big picture that I've personally run into and it royally pisses me off. Like you said new tech is vital to future harm reduction, but accessibility to currently available green tech is important too and the financial barriers to it is something we should focus on as well.
That's not a "tipping point", then. Being past a tipping point means that future harm is unavoidable.
Future harm is unavoidable. There is worse future harm avoidable. It's really not that hard of a concept.
Shit is already gonna be bad, but we can prevent it from becoming really bad.
It's the difference between what they can do and what they're willing to do. Future generations will think us fools.